Grassley's Oversight Investigation into the political corruption of the FBI and DOJ

[Pavlov]

Yes Wray is free to criticize the memo.

Again, how is posting this bashing Wray?

Be specific.

That's not the only tweet you posted.

You lie more every day, TSA.

Do you believe your own lies?

[Pavlov]

So Trump's men in the DOJ and FBI unknowingly played into Trump's hands.

Any word from fake Hannity?

[Pavlov]

And you guys do realize Assange is ting on people for swallowing the narrative, don't you?

He's ting on you.

[TSA]

That's not the only tweet you posted.

You lie more every day, TSA.

Do you believe your own lies?

Here is the other tweet you quoted.

How is posting this bashing Wray? Be specific.

[Chris]

Swamp creatures in full panic

[TSA]

Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so

Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?

Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule. His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . . I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.

You were giddy when you found out Strzok drafted the Clinton letter and now you are just ignoring these texts. Why?

[Chris]

[TSA]

Chris

[Chris]

PANIC MODE!

[Chris]

Word is Donna Brazile will be implicated by the memo.

[Chris]

TRUMP




Donald Trump Has Read Controversial FBI Intelligence Memo; Plans to Release on Friday

A White House official confirmed to reporters that President Donald Trump has read the House Intelligence Committee FISA memo after the committee voted to release it to the public and plans to release it on Friday.
The official confirmed that White House officials examined the memo to check for classified information, but that the president was comfortable with the release as long as Congress approved it.

“The president is ok with it,” an official told reporters after they boarded Air Force One with the president after his speech in West Virginia. “I doubt there will be any redactions. It’s in Congress’ hands after that.”

A second official confirmed to Breitbart News that the do ent would likely be released on Friday.

In response, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer demanded Speaker Paul Ryan remove Rep. Devin Nunes as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, accusing him of “dangerous partisanship.”

Other Democrats protested that Nunes altered the memo before sending it to the White House. But staffers for Nunes dismissed Democrat concerns, noting that they were merely grammatical fixes and two edits requested by the FBI and even Democrats on the committee.

The F.B.I. has protested the publication of the memo, a vote that was approved by the House Intelligence Committee, however efforts to get the president to block it’s release appear to have failed for now.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/01/donald-trump-read-controversial-fbi-intelligence-memo-plans-release-friday/

#WhentheSchiffHitstheFan #PelosiPanic

[koriwhat]

Word is Donna Brazile will be implicated by the memo.

hopefully it comes true. i want a front row seat to her hanging. that **** HRC!

[koriwhat]

right?! if that old pelosi can understand it and she still thinks bush is president then i think we can handle it unredacted! ing bag of bones dip dementia pelosi.

[Chris]

Would be epic

[Chris]

Duncan going HAM

[Chris]

[Pavlov]

Here is the other tweet you quoted.

How is posting this bashing Wray? Be specific.

You forgot muh Nunes.

Jesus.

[Pavlov]

"Adoptions"

[Pavlov]

Word is Donna Brazile will be implicated by the memo.

Fake meme.

[Chris]

[Chris]

[Chris]

TRUMP




Donald Trump Has Read Controversial FBI Intelligence Memo; Plans to Release on Friday




#WhentheSchiffHitstheFan #PelosiPanic

[Chris]

[DarrinS]

Swamp creatures in full panic

It’s a counterintelligence investigation

[TSA]

New FBI messages reveal agents sought way to evade federal record requirements

There’s an important but little-noticed subtext in the revelations about alleged FBI misconduct in the investigations into Hillary Clinton’s email practices and Donald Trump’s Russia associations.

It’s the light they shine on what has come to be routine obstruction of public records laws by federal officials.

The records that federal agencies generate while in our employ aren’t owned by faceless bureaucrats or political officials who can choose to withhold or disclose at their discretion and convenience. The records are owned by us: the public.


That includes text messages.

In the past two decades as communications via email, smart phones and social media have grown routine, there’s evidence that federal officials have consciously devised ways to thwart public records laws and keep their communications — our records — secret. Federal officials have used private email accounts, private servers and aliases (not their own name) for public business. They have deleted or lost messages that are supposed to be saved.

And they have learned to use text messaging.

In a new exchange released by the Senate Homeland Security committee today, FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok seem to discuss this very issue in private texts.

Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so

Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?

Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule. His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . . I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.

It’s a shockingly cavalier at ude from an attorney and high level FBI official.

There are more text messages between Strzok and Page from a critical time period, as we now know, that the FBI claimed had been lost in a technical glitch. After that became public, the Inspector General said he was able to recover them. (Interesting that the FBI couldn’t.)

Where are all those text messages now? Instead of providing them directly to Congress, the Inspector General is giving the recovered text messages to the Department of Justice which then can give them to Congress (after any bad actors theoretically implicated in the texts have time to mount a fulsome defense).

This is just one artery of a huge problem that also includes federal agencies routinely violating Freedom of Information Act law. They’ve twisted the law on its head, using it to obstruct and delay the release of obviously public information. They filter legitimate public records through political reviews before releasing them in a process that isn’t, in my view, allowed under Freedom of Information law.

http://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-...6EB43c.twitter


Will be interesting to see if the MSM reports on these text messages as heavily as they reported on Strzok's first draft of the Hillary letter

Pavlov why the sudden no comment on these texts after happily discussing the Strzok texts yesterday?