Reply With Quote
But but its a nuttinburgerfalling for Gorilla TV and expecting anybody to take you seriously again.
It's going to be a nothingiceberg.
But but its a nuttinburger
*Risitas
But but its a nuttinburger
I'd have to see the private sources for every FISA application to see if that's not a nothingburger too.Selective question answering
Why would the FBI hide who funded the Steele dossier when they presented it to the FISC
Do you have those on you?
Try again.
Why would the FBI hide who funded the Steele dossier when they presented it to the FISC?
because Memo is cute and harmless at first glance but
That's one cute rabbit, tbh.
"Everything is fine!"
Alreaday answered. I don't know what the disclosure standards are for FISA applications.
Do you have those on you?
If the intel is verified I'm trying to find out what your point is. Nunes didn't read any of the underlying do ents so there's no telling what information was used.
It's all still innuendo, and as such a nothingburger.
Keep hope alive!
Pot meet kettle.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...t-does-it-mean
The best they can muster is “if there’s a scandal here, it’s pretty minor”
We already know the Steele dossier wasn't verified at the time it was submitted to the FISC and it still isn't verified.
Do you think the FISC would approve a FISA warrant if the FBI told them the Steele dossier they were submitting to obtain a FISA warrant was paid for by the DNC yes or no?
Do you? No part of it has ever been verified? At all?
I don't know if the court is concerned with that if the information is verified.Do you think the FISC would approve a FISA warrant if the FBI told them the Steele dossier they were submitting to obtain a FISA warrant was paid for by the DNC yes or no?
The only way any of this gets answered is to release the information used to make the memo. Nunes didn't even read any of it, so what does that say about the memo itself?
lmao
from "omg #ReleaseTheMemo #TheUnravelling"
to
"wait and seeeeeee!"
OK, so the dossier is available and the claim is it was used to get a FISA warrant on Carter Page.
Which parts of the dossier were used?
Did you even read the article? None of the below is minor.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...t-does-it-mean
The best they can muster is “if there’s a scandal here, it’s pretty minor”
The key finding of the Nunes Memo is that the Steele dossier “formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application,” without informing the FISA court that it originated from a partisan source, and that the “corroboration” for the Steele dossier was a Michael Isikoff article that was itself sourced from the dossier. As law professor Orin Kerr explains, that’s not necessarily a legal defect in the application. Nor, obviously, does it show that Carter Page should not have been a legitimate target for FISA surveillance. But it does suggest that the process of launching the Page investigation by the Obama DOJ and FBI got warped by presidential politics in the heat of campaign season and wasn’t adequately disclosed to the courts, two things that should not happen.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...t-does-it-mean
It focuses on then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, who do ented Steele’s statement in September 2016 to the effect that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president,” and highlights that ever-present feature of incestuous DC operations: while Ohr was holding down a nominally nonpartisan job, his “wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump,” another fact not told to the FISA court.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...t-does-it-mean
"In other words, the Nunes Memo appears to reflect the FBI’s own view that the Steele dossier was in fact essential to the obtaining of the original FISA warrant."
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...t-does-it-mean
"On the other hand, within those narrow confines, it does make a persuasive case – pending any detailed rebuttal by its partisan Democratic critics – that flimsily-corroborated Democratic Party campaign opposition research succeeded in influencing law enforcement to spy on a U.S. citizen involved in the political process at the height of a presidential campaign. That may not be an enormous scandal in size, but it is, if true, a scandal."
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...t-does-it-mean
"flimsily-corroborated"
No one can make that call unless they have the FISA warrant. Which is why we're getting a four page memo.
Wow, Liberals are in full damage control mode.
Seeing as there is no damage, lol.
Only because you Libs dont care about ethics or image, as long it fits your agenda... anything goes.
you dismiss it because the right have been saying the same for about a yr now. this is just the beginning. now it's proven the dnc, hrc, fbi, fisa, and the doj are all corrupt. who knows what the next step entails? i can't wait til your little bs hipster dreams of a utopia come crashing down.
You haven't read the memo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
