Reply With Quote
Plus Danny Green is an incentive towards being able to make a run at LeBron during the off-season - given the friendship between DG and LBJ.
Are re ed homers here choosing Green or Fatty s over Bradley????
Holee
Of course....
Goddamnhomerism is a cancer
Plus Danny Green is an incentive towards being able to make a run at LeBron during the off-season - given the friendship between DG and LBJ.
Leave it to Spurs fans to think the Spurs could get a somewhat valuable commodity for an overpriced piece of on s terrible contract. Funny how it's D-league Danny for the past two years that nobody can stand but when he goes up on the trading block, people lose their .
Non issue. Spurs would have to renounce Green anyway if they're adding LeBron.
Not necessarily and they can’t renounce him. Danny has a player option. SA would have to trade him maybe.
I doubt he picks his option. If he does and LeBron is coming then they'd have to trade him. If he opts out they'll have to renounce him ($15 mil cap hold). I doubt he loves LeBron so much that he'd play for the room exception.
The Spurs did not fly under the radar this year lol
Spurs, for one - if they had ever eased in.
Lou Williams is having a better year than Danny and just signed for the MLE. Who knows. I can see Danny playing one more year for that money.
Double ugh.
Ugh Ugh
that . I'd much rather have Green than Bradley. Bradley only makes sense as a way to salary dump Fifty.
Spurs aren't trading Danny Green plus a first round pick for a non-all star. That's all chirp. If the Spurs were willing to toss in a first, they would've done so already and the deal would be done. Spurs aren't trading the first round pick for anyone but an all-star. The first round pick is a contract on the cheap and given the direction of the salary cap, they are too valuable to throw at a player who MAY be a little better than Danny, but won't push the Spurs past the GSW.
I would definitely take Bradley over green since I think he can create more offense than green. Would not however give up a 1st...with Murray running the offense a scoring sg is of greater need.
Yea as poorly as Danny has shot the ball this season, this trade wouldn't make much sense if it's just a straight up swap between the two players + a 1st-Round pick. That would be a ty deal for us.
Or that the opportunity to play with Danny would be a real inducement for LeBron.
And you're a baby back who cries all the time
" in Spurstalk" yet proceeds to post here over and over
You’re a top 5 cliff jumper...And you're a baby back who cries all the time
" in Spurstalk" yet proceeds to post here over and over
You troll to get attention...
Spurs win by 50 and you about giving up a 30pt 4th quarter...
New feud alert!
And you're a top 5 poster period
Sounds like no one here has really thought of this.
I think its sensible to imagine that Marc Stein got his info from the Clippers. And Clippers purposely informed Stein about the high end of their asking price (or discussion) with the Spurs to inflate Avery Bradleys' value the last hours of the deadline. That's all it is. The Clippers wanted to get that information out to the public for their own benefit.
Even with the mistakes they made last summer, I don't think RC/Pop would be that dumb to trade Danny for Avery Bradley -- I'm not even talking about the 1st.
If Spurs were really going to do this dumbass trade, the deal would be done already.
Could care less tbh lol. Just calling you out on your BS post...And you're a top 5 poster period
I got 3 Spurs up under my name
Coach Mac 87 got nothing but lame
Canadians are a nice, but don’t get excited
I may jump off cliffs but you’re the one who just dieded
You are so much better at this than I am
As you should, I can take it
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions