Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Chris]

[Chris]

[DarrinS]

i dont keep track. the website does. heres the 1k club

I’m at the bottom of that “club” with RG, so why keep pushing my post count? Seems pretty lame.

[djohn2oo8]

Funny how these MAGA folks are proponents of Russian propaganda.

[djohn2oo8]

I’m at the bottom of that “club” with RG, so why keep pushing my post count? Seems pretty lame.

Because you say you don't care about the topic yet you keep coming back.

[spurraider21]

I’m at the bottom of that “club” with RG, so why keep pushing my post count? Seems pretty lame.

because you have 1000 posts saying [shrug, i dont care]. thats a lot of time invested in a thread you dont think is relevant

[DarrinS]

Because you say you don't care about the topic yet you keep coming back.

I’m skeptical of the collusion angle, which accounts for a large fraction of my posts. Is skepticism the same thing as apathy? Does one only “care” if they buy into the collusion narrative?

[DarrinS]

because you have 1000 posts saying [shrug, i dont care]. thats a lot of time invested in a thread you dont think is relevant

See my latest post. Update your counter. Lol

[spurraider21]

directly from his memo

[spurraider21]

now you can argue his memo is inaccurate, but lol, to suggest his memo confirms the very thing it explicitly says didnt happen is just re ed

[Chris]

[DarrinS]

Mueller has a difficult job. He has to get scalps AND show that FBI and DOJ acted in good faith. This seems to be the thrust of the article I posted earlier by McCarthy. Oh well.

[DarrinS]

But, muh post count!

[spurraider21]

I’m skeptical of the collusion angle, which accounts for a large fraction of my posts. Is skepticism the same thing as apathy? Does one only “care” if they buy into the collusion narrative?

no. you're just disingenuous. much of your post history in this thread is two word posts like"muh russia," some snarky irrelevant post about pee-pee tapes, or a sarcastic BOOM

[DarrinS]

no. you're just disingenuous. much of your post history in this thread is two word posts like"muh russia," some snarky irrelevant post about pee-pee tapes, or a sarcastic BOOM

Ok, counselor

[Spurminator]

I’m skeptical of the collusion angle, which accounts for a large fraction of my posts. Is skepticism the same thing as apathy? Does one only “care” if they buy into the collusion narrative?

What element of the collusion angle was your dismissive post about Adam Schiff about? I could be wrong but I don't recall such kneejerk dismissal of the Nunes memo from you.

[Chris]

directly from his memo

They were spying on Trump



https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2...on-trump-team/

[djohn2oo8]

Mueller has a difficult job. He has to get scalps AND show that FBI and DOJ acted in good faith. This seems to be the thrust of the article I posted earlier by McCarthy. Oh well.

Lol. Looks like the courts have determined they have acted in good faith.

[Chris]

[djohn2oo8]

They were spying on Trump



https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2...on-trump-team/

https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxne...apped.amp.html

No wiretap.

[Chris]

[djohn2oo8]

Poor Chris. Missing exactly the criteria for the warrant to be granted. People like him should not breed.

[djohn2oo8]

[Chris]

https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxne...apped.amp.html

No wiretap.

Comey said no wiretap. Comey is such an honest person.

[Chris]

n March, House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said members of the intelligence community "incidentally collected" communications from the Trump transition team during legal surveillance operations of foreign targets.

But Nunes said he was unsure whether the surveillance occurred at Trump Tower -- as the president has suggested.

Trump reacted by saying he felt “somewhat” vindicated by Nunes’ comments.

They were spying on Trump.