Doesn't change your failure.
Yup. Just got to let the tantrum run its course.
Doesn't change your failure.
There is no failure. NYT shamelessly made a Harvard hire about #MePoo and Black Crimes matter even though the incoming president is eminently qualified.
No, they did not.
They never said he was unqualified either.
"lamenting"
Nor did I say they did. More failure from you.
So why bring it up?
It totally undermines your own argument.
Wow. You are not hitting on any cylinders, are you?
It doesn't undermine my argument one iota.
Also at you taking all these L's in pursuit of just the smallest W you can find. Par.
The NYT didn't lament anything in that article. That's all.
The thread didn't work out for you.
Yup. They made what could've been a straight-forward article one big lamentation about so-called white male privilege trumping #MePoo and Black Crimes Matter. And they did so through the methodology of frontloading (something they apparently don't teach at UTSA).
#MePoo
No lamentation.
Sorry.
The subtext is a big lamentation.
Not sorry.
No and lol the idea of burying lamentation in subtext.
at the idea that you consider yourself any sort of analyst while writing off the concept of subtext.
Today's blue-pill recipient.
no one ever said anyone is an analyst.
today's lying rag
Well, it's good that you don't consider yourself to be any sort of substantial political analyst.
Rather you're here in the role of a chirping hen.
DMX7
What's your (likely sanctimonious) take on this?
as long as you know you're wrong about the lamenting.
Chirping hen response.
You're the one who failed to prove "the subtext"
I've shown you sufficient evidence. You're now doing your typical nu uh schtick.
You showed the Times said Harvard could have made one choice but did not.
That's all.
Frontloading a lamentation that was not the crux of the article. Are you unfamiliar with the concept of subliminal advertising, or is this another way that UTSA failed you?
Now it's subliminal advertising of lamentation?
How come this doesn't have its own thread? Seems to me this speaks volumes that no one here is talking about it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)