Reply With Quote
I have neither the time, nor the crayons to explain it to you.
Feel free to explain how you used it correctly.
Feel free to explain how you perceive that I used the word wrong so that I can then proceed to laugh at you.Sure thing DK poster boy.
I have neither the time, nor the crayons to explain it to you.
Feel free to explain how you used it correctly.
That's what I thought, .
Seems like there is no end to the things you don't understand.
It's your assertion, head.
Seems like there is no end to the things you don't understand.
"doesn't understand the burden of proof"
I am not going to be tricked into explaining it to you.It's your assertion, head.
You're not going to be tricked into making a case for your charge?I am not going to be tricked into explaining it to you.
You didn't use pedantic correctly.You're not going to be tricked into making a case for your charge?
Explain how so.
I think he was being frivolous. He was actually taking your side.
Someone asking you to explain your statements ISNT pedantic. If you had explained your statements and then they asked for links to every supporting fact, then they are being pedantic.
You did not use it correctly. You use a lot of words incorrectly and it's obvious when you're incorporating a newly learned word into your v9cabulary.
Now, don't go flying off the hilt, I'm trying to help ya out here.
This is either a funny statement or you're wayyyyy off base here, boss.
Wasn't trying to be funny. It sounded like a quip at first glance.
Oh. I wasn't making fun of the issue, but also not trying to be a helping him use it properly.
He was requesting that I name major Democrats associated with Hillary Clinton / John Podesta. You don't think that's pedantic?
I didn't want to respond to this before seeing his unimpeded full re response. No, he has sand way up his vagina when it comes to me if you haven't noticed yet.
LOL, yeah. You're mad because you used a word incorrectly, many people pointed it out and I was trying to help you out. You flew off the hilt per par. It's great you want to grow your vocabulary, most 30 somethings dont.
Answer the question, head. You don't think it's pedantic to name major Democrats associated with Hillary/Podesta?
You made a giant blanket statement. They asked you to name some of the "major" players you cite and you didn't/couldn't.
That's not pedantic. That's you not being able to back up your claim and not using words properly.
Like I said, I wasn't being a , I'm trying to help you use a word properly so your vocabulary choices are accurate.
Your inferiority complex is so thick you can't even discern help from an insult.
You have issues, dude.
You're a gy temperamental bag that never grew up properly and acts out everytime you get set straight. Chucho corrected you, as did Spurraider, RandomGuy and Fuzzy and you're still refusing to accept it 3 days later.
Not only was he right about you using the word in the wrong context, but he also is right that you use words wrong pretty much on a daily basis.
Either work on your wording or make peace with your lack of education and continue being a bleeding insecure vagina.
BOOM.You have issues, dude.
You're a gy temperamental bag that never grew up properly and acts out everytime you get set straight. Chucho corrected you, as did Spurraider, RandomGuy and Fuzzy and you're still refusing to accept it 3 days later.
Not only was he right about you using the word in the wrong context, but he also is right that you use words wrong pretty much on a daily basis.
Either work on your wording or make peace with your lack of education and continue being a bleeding insecure vagina.
Queue the "tranny Reck" response and "sandy vagina" response and if Blake gets in on this, the "cuck" response.
(sighs)
Pedantic would be quibbling over a definition that was beside the main point. The main sense of the word is "overly tangential".
Chucho is right on this one.
Ask you to specifically explain your main point in some detail is not "overly tangential".
You're not trying to do other than be your head self. He wanted me to show something that didn't needed no showing (the Clintons/Podestas are OBVIOUSLY connected). It was pedantic to a ing tee, cunnnt.
Nothing to do with an inferior complex; and if you're gonna continue to be a re , then I may just develop a superiority complex when it comes to you.
You need to go look up the word. You obviously don't understand the various applications of the word. Ironic that you tried to call me out and only made yourself look like a total ing idiot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
