Reply With Quote
From the Republican side who's name have they leaked that was picked up in electronic communications and unmasked?
From the Republican side who's name have they leaked that was picked up in electronic communications and unmasked?
From the Republican side who's name have they leaked that was picked up in electronic communications and unmasked?
Chris cheerleading like every time. Can't formulate an original thought of his own.
Didn't he say he had no deals in Russia?
https://lawfareblog.com/do ent-hou...-status-report
called it. He didnt have to present as evidence of Trump/Russia collusion. Thanks for providing the link and stomping your own .
https://lawfareblog.com/do ent-hou...-status-report
TSA.
Didn't he say he had no deals in Russia?
Lordy! Gowdy taking a massive on PeeSA.
Negotiating doesnt mean both parts agreed and signed a deal, 21 pages is too much to read, specially if that stupid butthurt lesbian cant understand that difference.
Didn't he say he had no deals in Russia?
page 4 - campaign knowledge of the hackhttps://lawfareblog.com/do ent-hou...-status-report
seems to be decent for starters. oversized gifs/jpgs dont really accomplish much
Rehashing public reports on George Papadopolous is not presenting evidence of Trump/Russia collusion
Try again.
Why are you quoting an article that s on your previous article?
Rehashing public reports on George Papadopolous is not presenting evidence of Trump/Russia collusion
Try again.
do you dispute that prior to the release of the emails to wikileaks, that russians consulted with the trump campaign and previewed the release of that information to them?Rehashing public reports on George Papadopolous is not presenting evidence of Trump/Russia collusion
Try again.
This hurts Chris more than TSA, imo.
Lordy! Gowdy taking a massive on PeeSA.
Like a dagger through the heart.
Not at all. Gowdy was speaking on a hypothetical. Clinton didn't win. That's that.
Yes. Adam Schiff is full of as usual. He’s releasing information he knows will be slapped down again for inaccuracies just like his first memo.
Here is what Schiff said a few weeks ago, “the Russians previewed to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” He cleverly changed the wording in the memo and it takes on a whole different meaning.
What proof does Schiff have Russia gave Wikileaks the emails? Wikileaks denies it. Russia denies it.
Can you find anywhere in the Papadopolous affidavit that says Joseph Mifsud showed previews of the actual stolen emails to him?
Anywhere in that same affidavit that says Mifsud would be able to help disseminate those same emails?
When did Mifsud become a Russian?
LOL TSA and Chris
The Rich family claims that the “defendants’ conduct was extreme and outrageous” in what they allege was a deliberate effort to portray Seth Rich as a “criminal and traitor to the United States.”
lol WTF
For a family that just wanted this to go away this is a dumb ing way to go about it. Dumb ing lawsuit too.
Parents are going after money. Sick society we live in.
Butowsky called the lawsuit "one of the dumbest" he'd ever seen in an interview with ABC News. “Mr. and Mrs. Rich should come forward and be honest with people,” he said, adding that he's reached out to them repeatedly to tell what he claims to be the truth.
“Nobody’s benefited from anything," he added. "To file a lawsuit to say that anybody has benefited just smells weird.”
Schiff claims the DOJ presented this information to the FISA court. Papadopolous wasn’t under surveillance nor was a FISA warrant sought on him. Steele never mentioned Papadopolous. Why was Papadopolous name being mentioned to FISA court? If what Schiff is claiming is even true.
Back Channel To Christopher Steele Goes On The Record About Senate Testimony
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/03/1...ate-testimony/
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
