It's not a contest. I always correct myself if I feel I've said something incorrect or misleading.
You, on the other hand, don't. Am I supposed to feel ashamed? Most people don't consider willful dishonesty to be a virtue.
Hunn ity is DEPLORABLE
Hannity Blasts the Special Counsel: ‘Mueller Doesn’t Care About The Truth’
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/hannity-...out-the-truth/
It's not a contest. I always correct myself if I feel I've said something incorrect or misleading.
You, on the other hand, don't. Am I supposed to feel ashamed? Most people don't consider willful dishonesty to be a virtue.
Another thing. TSA is saying Mueller is doing his job by handing out all these subpoenas and gathering witness testimony. So how come the house intel committee didn't even subpoena everyone that Mueller has? Which is it TSA? Mueller is doing his job and the house intel committee wasn't? Both can't be "just doing their jobs" when one hasn't interviewed half the witnesses that Mueller has.
Be happy to answer your questions after you respond to this one from earlier.
Do you accept another $500 bet from me that Trump doesn’t go to prison over this yes or no?
I will ask you again. you said Mueller is just doing is job. So then why didn't the house intel committee interview the same people?
Be happy to answer your questions after you respond to this one from earlier.
Do you accept another $500 bet from me that Trump doesn’t go to prison over this yes or no?
In how many new ways do you enjoy being duped?
Trump would rather keep McMaster for a few weeks more in order to claim fake news and then end up firing him anyways later.
It's what happened with Tillerson.Trump making the same move twice.
dat nothingburger continues to deliver
McMaster and Kelly were there to keep Trump from starting a nuclear war. McMaster leaving and now Kelly resigning means we are near the end. Heads up.
"It is TOTALLY a coincidence that he was fired the day after he criticized Russia, and I absolutely believe an administration that blatantly and constantly lies about everything when they say it wasn't."
You have got to be one of the most gullible mother ers I have met, after mouse.
Nixon was pardoned by Ford for obstruction of justice.
Trump, having more than likely laundered money for organized crime for years, probably not.
I wouldn't take that bet mostly because he is too old and in poor health. His mental decline is beginning to be obvious even to fanboys.
Man, I really wanted to take $1000 of your money over "Muellers going after Hillary"
I don't bet, but I can do better things with your money than you would.
TSA ok with political witch hunts now.
Trump and Tillerson also disagreed publicly on the future of the nuclear deal with Iran. “We were not really thinking the same,” Trump said Tuesday about his differences with Tillerson over the agreement. “With Mike, Mike Pompeo, we have a very similar thought process.” Trump had called the agreement “the worst deal in history” and wanted the U.S. to withdraw from it. Tillerson said the deal was flawed, but that it did what it was supposed to: freeze Iran’s nuclear program. He had been working with U.S. allies who are part of the agreement to find a solution to the impasse caused by Trump’s position.
They were also divided on NATO: Trump dismissed it as irrelevant while, early in his presidency, appearing to condition U.S. support for its NATO allies on their defense expenditures. Tillerson tried to soothe the fears this caused within the alliance, which were being exacerbated by Russia’s increasingly muscular foreign policy.
On Qatar, Trump appeared to blame Doha for the impasse with its Gulf neighbors (and for funding terrorism), while Tillerson supported a negotiated settlement among America’s Arab allies—who include Qatar as well as the Saudi and UAE-led coalition pushing to isolate the country.
Tillerson cautioned the president against moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, which Trump did anyway; and he wanted the U.S. to stay in the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement and the Paris climate accord, both of which Trump withdrew the U.S. from.
I would call him stupid moreso than gullible.
Well well well....looks like we finally know now why Judge Contreras was recused, he and Peter Strzok were buddies.
New Text Msgs Reveal FBI Agent was Friends with Judge in Flynn Case
ewly redacted text messages discovered by congressional investigators reveal that an embattled FBI agent at the center of the Russia investigation controversy was close friends with a District of Columbia judge who recused himself from the criminal case over former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, congressional members said, and text do ents show.
The never before seen text messages, which were a part of the texts given to congress by the Department of Justice, show that FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his paramour FBI attorney Lisa Page discussed Strzok’s relationship with U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, who presided over a Dec. 1, 2017 hearing where former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. Strzok was removed from Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office last year after anti-Trump text messages between him and his FBI agent lover were discovered by the DOJ’s Inspector General Michael Horowitz. But on Dec. 7, without warning, Judge Rudolph Contreras was removed as the presiding judge on Flynn’s case. Little information was given at the time as to why Contreras was removed.
DOJ officials did not immediately respond for comment.
In a text message chain from Page to Strzok on July, 25, 2016 she writes, “Rudy is on the FISC! Did you know that? Just appointed two months ago.” At that point, the pair continues to discuss other issues but comes back to Contrares, “I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.” Then later Strzok appears to return to his discussion about Contreras.
Page: “Thought of it because you had to Google FISC judges and him there. I’m telling you.”
Strzok: “….She brought up a good point about being cir spect in talking to him in terms of not placing him into a situation where he’d have to recuse himself.”
Page: “I can’t imagine you either one of you could talk about anything in detail meaningful enough to warrant recusal.” Page then goes back to discussing a different issue saying, “Anyway, maybe you meant to, but didn’t.’
Strzok: “Really? Rudy. I’m in charge of espionage for the FBI. Any espionage FISA comes before him, what should he do? Given his friend oversees them?”
Page: “Standards for recusal are quite high. I just don’t think this poses an actual conflict. And he doesn’t know what you do?”
Strzok: “Generally he does know what I do. Not the level or scope or area but he’s super thoughtful and rigorous about ethics and conflicts. (redacted) suggested a social setting with others would probably be better than a one on one meeting. I’m sorry, I’m just going to have to invite you to that tail party. Of course you’ll be there. Have to come up with some other work people cover for action.”
https://saraacarter.com/explosive-te...s-with-strzok/
TSA meltdown is entertaining tbh
blabla dip blabla dip blabla dip
I'm still waiting on the indictment of Susan Rice.
What are you thoughts on Contreras and Strzok being friends? Should that have been revealed before Contreras accepted Flynn's guilty plea?
Look at that deflection. Susan Rice laugh and laugh.
![]()
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)