Reply With Quote
By Woj of all people.
No, Brandon, it's your game that's funny, tbh.
By Woj of all people.
No. They lost one game (on the road without Green) and then beat Cleveland. Then Kawhi's camp (since it obviously wasn't the team) claimed he was close to returning. That February 26, almost two weeks before Salters' report. It was right after Kawhi got back from NYC. Then about a week later (after the team got back to losing), Kawhi gave that press conference and Salters' report came out.
It's unfortunate it's bad for the team, but to know I'm right after all this time is oddly satisfying. Even the Kawhi suckers on here are having to acknowledge the truth at this point.
Woj is still one of the best in the business, but he hasn't been as reliable ever since he went to ESPN.
Surprise surprise.
Yea. But Kawhi's people haven't cleared him, so it all seems pointless. It's good to hear that he's looking good at least
Oh of re . They looked awful and was an .500 team even before kawhi first returned. What baseline bum was saying is true.
You making out this teams tines entirely based on chemsitry is bolloks. The team is garbage without kawhi. A sub 50 win team team.
As i have been saying, kawhi doesnt give a about San Antonio anymore. I am the biggest kawhi fanboy.
But i can tell you with 90% certainty, he doesnt give a rat ass about San Antoniom
He has potential to be a good representative for the players at the NBPA meetings. Maybe that's why he wasn't cut. He's clearly aware of the need for rest and good meals in relation to performance and isn't afraid to voice concerns or address media.
/sarcasm
Jabari Young jumped out to wipe his arses.
LOL one game being some kind of proof of good chemistry.
BB was correct in what he said, but he wasn't talking about what I said.
They literally are an above-500 team without Kawhi.You making out this teams tines entirely based on chemsitry is bolloks. The team is garbage without kawhi. A sub 500 team.
We already know you're the biggest CoK worshipper on this site. All we needed to see where the threads talking about how physically attractive you found him to be.As i have been saying, kawhi doesnt give a about San Antonio anymore. I am the biggest kawhi fanboy.
But i can tell you with 90% certainty, he doesnt give a rat ass about San Antoniom
I do believe Woj possibly embellished his report since BP3 and Danny disagree with the characterization of it. But the meeting did happen and the subject of the meeting was accurate. Woj didn't make it up. He has most definitely a good source.
Still doesn't change the fact that they turned in a very strong performance in a game most folks expected them to lose handily. Regardless, that was when the leaks about Kawhi's return happened, not after the 2-3 stretch like you claimed.
It's not our business what is going on in the spurs locker room. and we just can't understand a what's going on there for real just because we have the best franchise in the nba where info leak is impossible-end of the story. kawhi is injuried and he is still the spur! all the doubters and haters!
yea LDN and BP3 aside, why haven't the players with more weight in the organization done the same? I would be quicker to blow this off if MVParker, Manu or LaMarcus said something disavowing the reports. Their silence is deafening as the fires are starting to rage.
and that's the part about Woj that has changed and no doubt it is attributed to ESPN. i guarantee he is instructed to e up his headlines so that it gets more clicks and then the rest of the article is obtuse enough where it needs to be in order to facilitate more conjecture. too bad about Woj selling out like that but he's big time now and making the $$$ so i'm sure he's content.
$200 million reasons to stay tbh
The "Woj" label is starting to tarnish. Has he been right about anything with Kawhi?
2 players from the meeting confirm this is fake news.
It would've been very low class of them to force an injured player to return.
Waiting for Kawhi's lawyer/friend/representative/personal assistant YGWHI or whatever to come and spin this.
Been saying for awhile now that Kawhi has been causing problems in the locker room, which is why the Spurs thought about trading him before the deadline. I don't want to believe because he's such a good player, but all this drama and stories coming out can't be a coincidence
By "spin" you mean go off of what two players from the meeting said and not a reporter outside of the meeting?
I got to know a lot of Spurs players pretty well in the early days, back when they were very accessible to fans. I never met a player at any level of any sport that didn't want to get back to the game he loves asap. So the Leonard thing continues to puzzle.
This is a 26 year old man with a ghetto boy's mind, trying to make decisions on so much money, it staggers our imagination. He can make more in one year than several of us together can make in a lifetime. My guess is he has gotten a lot of outside advice on how to play his hand. If so, it probably bad advice from the Spurs standpoint.
But either way, the Spurs will be forced to offer the Supermax deal.
There's nothing to disavow.
The meeting happened. Maybe it wasn't a confrontational meeting. More of a: how you doing? Are you coming back? What's up? We need you... when are you coming back?" Than a begging drama or whatever ESPN made it out to be, but why come out with details of a private meeting?
What's bad about this leak is that Manu and Mills spoke yesterday and Tony spoke a few days ago about th team mentally moving on. They seem to be tired of getting asked about this.
The last interview Tony gave around 3/15 or 3/16 he had said Kawhi wasn't practicing with the team and that he didn't know how he was doing. It makes sense Tony would have wanted to talk to Kiwi instead of learning things through the media, so he quarterbacked this meeting, but now they will get asked about this meeting instead.
Lol its like hey kawhi picked his nose in the bench that totally ruined the teams chemistry.
Complete im denial that this team is a sub 50 win team
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
