Gun Control

[Pavlov]

No.

Yes.

Congratulations.

[Chris]

*ding*

Congratulations.

Bandera blanca.

Felicitaciones.

[Nathan89]

Damn, Chris really wants to beat up on young victims of gun violence.

If they want to push policy on the rest of Americans then that's what they should expect. Can't beg for policy and pull the victim card when confronted. That's absurd but of course you think that's reasonable.

[sickdsm]

So you think Melania Trump looks like Caitlyn Jenner? This explains your life predicament

My thoughts exactly. Ones a nine, the other is a man.

[Blake]

You should know by now that I won't click on stupid links just to follow your breadcrumb trail to the next extreme example of you trying to make a point.

Read about the Battle of Gonzales.

But since 90% of the respondents to that poll said that they were in favor of these gun laws, why don't they just voluntarily give up their firearms and then 90% of the people should be disarmed if that poll is truly representative of the general population?

The link was a joke in reference to your stupid post.

[Blake]

My thoughts exactly. Ones a nine, the other is a man.

a 9.

She looks like Jenner. I'm sure they've both had some of the same plastic surgery done.

[Blake]

So you think Melania Trump looks like Caitlyn Jenner?

Yeah. Apparently I'm not the only one.

[Blake]

If they want to push policy on the rest of Americans then that's what they should expect. Can't beg for policy and pull the victim card when confronted. That's absurd but of course you think that's reasonable.

Word salad

[RandomGuy]

What is a well regulated militia?

You'll know when the time comes

If the organization isn't actually making newspapers, they're not really the press because they're not pressing anyting therefore freedom of the press doesn't mean anything anymore unless you're actually making newspapers using a physical press.

Just calling yourself a news agency should not give you any cons utional rights to say whatever you want unless you use a physical press.

So you don't know what a well regulated militia is.

[RandomGuy]

...

[sickdsm]

a 9.

She looks like Jenner. I'm sure they've both had some of the same plastic surgery done.

Again, Blake talking out of his ass. She's pushing near 50. Go round up 1000 random 50 yr old women and you try to show me 100 that are better looking.


Not sure why you bring up cosmetic surgery. You seem to really value the n natural body then compare her to someone that has had his chopped off.

[Blake]

Again, Blake talking out of his ass. She's pushing near 50. Go round up 1000 random 50 yr old women and you try to show me 100 that are better looking.


Not sure why you bring up cosmetic surgery. You seem to really value the n natural body then compare her to someone that has had his chopped off.

a nine

[Blake]

"American comedian David Mills*told Sam Delaney he thinks*Caitlyn Jenner, the famous transgender reality star, would be a great candidate for Melania's job, saying "I, for a long time,*have wanted someone to answer the question 'why has no one seen Melania Trump and Caitlyn Jenner in the same room.'"

http://talkradio.co.uk/news/melania-...an-17101920007

[rmt]

a 9.

She looks like Jenner. I'm sure they've both had some of the same plastic surgery done.

IMO, she's a 10 for an almost 48 year old - beautiful, stylish and elegant. I cannot look at Jenner without remembering his Olympic heroics and feeling slightly nauseous now (as in a prime male specimen turned into whatever he/she calls self now).

[Chris]

Yeah Blake's an idiot. ^

[Chris]

I say let the kids keep talking.

[KenMcCoy]

Yes, actually, it is a legal question.

Legal issues require definitions.

Cons utional issues require definitions.

Hand-waving doesn't really cut it in court, much to the chagrin of creationists, and people who believe in the voter fraud myth.


Define "properly operating"? Who determines what is properly operating and what isn't?

Define "citizen soldier".

“Well-Regulated Militia.” In United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, 179 (1939), we explained that “the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense.
...
Finally, the adjective “well-regulated” implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training."

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

[boutons_deux]

"in concert for the common defense"

no mention of Cons utional convention putting in the 2nd Amendment to mollify slave states, to get their ratifying votes, so that the slave states were guaranteed arms for their "slave patrols" aka "militias"

1) to hunt escaped slaves and

2) to put down slave rebellions?

you gun fellators have been so duped, lied to about the 2nd Amendment, it's hilarious.

Cons utional convention put in 2nd Amendment so the states could attack the national govt that the convention was trying to create?

Dems want to confiscate and/or ban all guns?

[spurraider21]

“Well-Regulated Militia.” In United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, 179 (1939), we explained that “the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense.
...
Finally, the adjective “well-regulated” implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training."

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

well then, looks like everybody needs to be properly trained to be part of the "well-regulated" militia. almost like requiring a license.

[Chris]

well then, looks like everybody needs to be properly trained to be part of the "well-regulated" militia. almost like requiring a license.

You're ready to roll over I bet.

[Blake]

You're ready to roll over I bet.

Who's gonna get you?

[boutons_deux]

well then, looks like everybody needs to be properly trained to be part of the "well-regulated" militia. almost like requiring a license.

nope, the so-called anti-activists-of-convenience oligarchy's SCOTUS 5 shills ACTIVIST-LY rewrote the ORIGINAL meaning and disconnected "right to bear arms" from "militia" in DC v er.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distri...mbia_v._ er

[Chris]

[KenMcCoy]

well then, looks like everybody needs to be properly trained to be part of the "well-regulated" militia. almost like requiring a license.

The first part of the 2A is a preface, not the only preface, but a preface.

"(a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22."

"(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.

[Pavlov]

If they want to push policy on the rest of Americans then that's what they should expect. Can't beg for policy and pull the victim card when confronted. That's absurd but of course you think that's reasonable.

Would you call the kids who went through the Parkland shooting victims?

Yes or no.