Reply With Quote
I figure he would say "so what?" again and we'd get around to it.
The end result is this: It's Mueller's job to investigate Roger Stone.
I figure he would say "so what?" again and we'd get around to it.
The end result is this: It's Mueller's job to investigate Roger Stone.
Wikileaks has been releasing do ents long before the Democrats got 'hacked' (Seth Rich) Do you think Stone gave the emails to Assange?
No.Wikileaks has been releasing do ents long before the Democrats got 'hacked' (Seth Rich) Do you think Stone gave the emails to Assange?
What makes you say Seth Rich did it?
Show your evidence.
You called it.
So why is Mueller investigating Stone? We came full circle and you tried to change the subject again. So Assange is head of wikileaks and he published the emails. Then what?
It's his job.
Read his mandate.
I'll wait for you to post it to prove you read it.
Nope, it's on subject.
Your question has been answered.
Russians steal emails.
Stone contacts Assange.
Assange posts emails.
Mueller investigates Stone.
Pretty simple.
So everyone that contacted Assange should be investigated by Mueller?
lol Pavlov
Everyone involved in the Trump campaign, yes.
Definitely.
Why would he not investigate people involved in the Trump campaign who contacted Assange?
List your reasons, White Chris.
Fair enough, but this is starting to sound like McCarthyism. Stone contacting Assange does little to warrant an investigation, that's why I was hoping you could clarify that for me. Looks like a witch hunt to me.
Lol
Actually that is a compelling reason to investigate Stone. I'm open to your reasons why he shouldn't, if you have any.
Nothing compelling at all unless you have some sort of wrongdoing which I can't see and you can't clarify. So far all we got is he contacted Assange. Nothing compelling about that.
So in an investigation into Russian interference and potential collusion with the Trump campaign, you don't think they should look into a guy who was part of the Trump campaign and was in contact with the organization that ultimately released information that is believed to have been acquired by Russians aiming to interfere with the election?
The wrongdoing is the stealing and leaking of emails. Stone said he contacted the Assange between the time the Democrats' emails were stolen and the time Assange leaked them.
Explain why Mueller shouldn't investigate this.
What Russian interference? Are you suggesting collusion is a crime? We know who hacked the DNC and why. Neither of you can tell me one thing that Roger Stone did that was wrong or should be investigated. Absolutely nothing.
Chris, the order is investigate, then charge, then try the case.
You want Mueller to prove Stone's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before he even investigates Stone.
white Chris.
Wrong thread.
Last edited by Spurminator; 04-02-2018 at 07:12 PM.
Remember those times TSA said Van Der Swaan was a nobody?
Zzzzz zzz
There are currently 15 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 15 guests)
Posting Permissions
