Reply With Quote
My Twitter sources are awesome:
That's what I figured.
My Twitter sources are awesome:
The Young Turks?! lmfao
Are you saying this is a good look for your lord and savior, Donald John David Dennison Trump?
Yes or no.
My guess is he did several NDA's as terribly as he did Stormy's, and they add up to a large amount of wrongdoing RE: campaign finance.My Twitter sources are awesome:
At the very least.
But this is such a big deal for all involved it could be much worse.
Since we're posting theoretically
Mueller didn't get these warrants.
Tee Hee
Allow me to add some positivity for trump. It's known I despise him for parading around as a Christian but I give him credit for this:
People trusted him and he spit in their face. I give him props for doing the right thing and paying up.
The Young Turks and CNN - bravo
You are praying it's more than just campaign finance law violations because if it is just campaign finance law violations the chances of the FEC ruling before the 2020 elections is basically zero.
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2018...uld-take-years
Jacob Wohl is a Trumpette. -20 points for quoting this wad.
Anyway, Cohen getting trolled by one of my Twitter sources:
W.F.C. (who ing cares?)
re: Privilege
Such a search requires an elaborate review process. The basic rule is that the government may not deliberately seize, or review, attorney-client communications. The USAM—and relevant caselaw—therefore require the feds to set up a review process. That process might involve a judge reviewing the materials to separate out what is privileged (or what might fall within an exception to the privilege), or else set up a "dirty team" that does the review but is insulated from the "clean team" running the investigation. Another option is a "special master," an experienced and qualified third-party attorney to do the review. Sometimes the reviewing team will only be identifying and protecting privileged material. Sometimes the reviewing team will be preparing to seek, or to implement, a court ruling that the do ents are not privileged. (Robert Mueller is aggressive on this sort of thing; he already sought and obtained a court ruling that some of Paul Manafort's communications with his lawyers were not privileged because they were undertaken for the purpose of fraud—the so-called "crime-fraud exception" to the attorney-client privilege.
What a great POTUS. SMH
Yep they ed up this time.
is twitter good or bad now? I can't tell
Here's your sign.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
