Will you support the Spurs when they move to Seattle?

[gambit1990]

i'd support kawhi. would care less for a spurs team with no duncan, manu, kawhi in general.

[Mugen]

Seattle no, but Vegas baby.

Yeah, Vegas would be great. I'd have the Spurs and Raiders an hour flight away

[Arcadian]

Seattle is a cool city, so why not?

[Dex]

They wouldn't be the Spurs. The Spurs team would be gone and the Seattle SuperSonics would just get our players.

This. Any team that ends up in Seattle will go back to being the Sonics, which is why Seattle included a provision that their history/records would go back to Seattle if they were to regain an NBA franchise.

That also means that the Spurs history and records would, in effect, be defunct.

That being said...Spurs aren't going anywhere.

[dbestpro]

So, I guess that means all those Sonic fans are Thunder fans. Because we know a Spurs move is extreme speculation, and that Seattle is a city that has been proven to not be able to hold onto their team.

[SpurPadre]

I’m not from San Antonio but I will never change my team in my lifetime so yeah I’ll still continue to stick with this franchise. It would be weird at first though, I’m sure.

Same here tbh. I'd love it if they moved to Oakland after the Dubs move to SF, though because I live near Oakland.

[TheGreatYacht]

I'll support Kawhi wherever he goes tbh

tbh

[Chinook]

Nope.

[.G.]

2032?

[suitedkings]

Since I live in Seattle....Yes!!

[Dingle Barry]

False premise. If the Spurs can't get a new place after their 30-year lease is up, they'll move to Austin.

They need to move to the north side, like they shoulda done last time.

[Pavlov]

They need to move to the north side, like they shoulda done last time.

They shoulda stayed downtown, but maybe once more quarries close around I-10/1604. I don't know enough about the available city/county properties down there, but if the ones they are discussing up here for the MLS stadium are still available when the lease runs out, I can see the possibility of an Austin move.

[TXstbobcat]

They need to move to the north side, like they shoulda done last time.

I agree. I hate going through that ghetto area to get to the AT&T center. NW side would be great.

[Play Boban]

If you go with them, yeah!!!

[Play Boban]

They're not moving. Fail thread.

it's boban. not only is it a fail thread, it's a troll thread.

[Play Boban]

The Spurs may have to move once San Antonio becomes a drug-infested hotbed of crime like Tijuana tbh. San Antonio will be annexed by Mexico soon.

But at least there’s Whataburger tbh...........

[gospursgojas]

The Spurs may have to move once San Antonio becomes a drug-infested hotbed of crime like Tijuana tbh. San Antonio will be annexed by Mexico soon.

But at least there’s Whataburger tbh...........

The wall isn’t gonna work?

[Dingle Barry]

They shoulda stayed downtown, but maybe once more quarries close around I-10/1604. I don't know enough about the available city/county properties down there, but if the ones they are discussing up here for the MLS stadium are still available when the lease runs out, I can see the possibility of an Austin move.

I've lived in Austin and don't see it as a good place for pro sports. Maybe MLS.

[Horse]

tbh

Will you continue to suck your moms ?

[BD24]

still pushing this tired narrative got

[Vic Petro]

Current lease agreement extends to 2032 iirc. AT&T naming rights expire after 2020 though so that will be a nice little cash injection for whoever owns the team then.

[offset formation]

I'd probably like them more as Seattle is both closer to LA and a better city than SA tbh.

Lol. Seattle is like 1100 miles, SA about 1300.

[SanAntonioSpurs23]

Seattle, bring the Spurs to San Diego. Id go to games unlike the fat fans in San Antonio.

[Play Boban]

The wall isn’t gonna work?

The Demoncrats aren’t going to allow our savior to build a wall tbh.

[Play Boban]

Will you continue to suck your moms ?

Maybe. You jelly?