You didn't answer. You just showed me that.
Dunno. Sure is a lot of smoke. Definitely enough for it to be investigated fully without interference. I'm fine with that.How confident are you that it happened?
I’m not arguing that it shouldn’t be investigated not sure why you even brought that up.
And how do YOU not know how confident YOU are in something? Put a number on it. Scale of 1-10 how confident are you that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to alter the election?
I simply don't know whether they did or not. That's why I want it to be fully investigated. That way I will know.
I am comfortable with not knowing in the meantime; very confident I can handle it.
I simply don’t know whether they did or not either. That’s why I also want it fully investigated. That way I will also know.
I am also comfortable with not knowing in the meantime; and also very confident I can handle it.
While we are waiting for investigation to complete let’s discuss how confident or not confident we are in what’s being investigated. On a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the most confident what is your level of confidence that Mueller will bring charges against any Trump campaign member for colluding with Russia to alter the election? My confidence level is a 1 that Mueller will bring those charges what is your confidence level?
Due to his work for foreign people and countries, Rudy may have trouble getting security clearance
Last edited by boutons_deux; 05-04-2018 at 07:48 PM.
Did Comey really think this stuff wouldn’t eventually come out?
Jim Baker and Lisa Page both resign. Nothing related to the OIG investigation I’m sure.
Did Comey really think this stuff wouldn’t eventually come out?
I don't know.
I simply don't have the muh bet need to quantify everything.
lol anonymous blog
Then why did Flynn plead guilty?
So you know it’s at the same level today as when it started, but you don’t know what level that is. Is that correct?
Let Mueller do his work.
Both Democrats and Republicans have snuggled up to these rich oligarchs who owe Putin.
Putin hates democracy and any kind of criticism.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/u...T.nav=top-news
No. I didn't know if anyone would be convicted then and I don't know now. It's not a matter of confidence because I don't look at it with a muh bet mentally.
Pretty simple.
Rudy, Subjectively
Rudy Giuliani is now a subject in at least two criminal investigations.
Mr. Giuliani is not, necessarily, culpable in any criminal case.
I will gladly this night bet one hundred American dollars, cash, that
he will be subpoenaed by either Robert Mueller’s office or the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York or both,
because he has indicated he has information valuable to both of those offices in ongoing investigations.
Giuliani asserted both
a detailed knowledge of Donald Trump’s motivations in firing FBI Director Comey (“He wouldn’t say the president wasn’t under investigation”)
and
detailed knowledge of the methods by which Stormy Daniels was paid to keep her from revealing a story that might damage Trump in the final weeks of the presidential campaign (“Can you imagine if this had come out in October?”).
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/3/1761884/-Rudy-Subjectively?detail=emaildkre
Last edited by boutons_deux; 05-05-2018 at 02:59 PM.
Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack
Investigators working for special counsel Robert Mueller have interviewed one of President Donald Trump's closest friends and confidants, California real estate investor Tom Barrack, The Associated Press has learned.
Barrack was interviewed as part of the federal investigation of possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 election
The specific topics covered in questions from Mueller's team were not immediately clear.
One of the people who spoke to AP said the questioning focused entirely on two officials from Trump's campaign who have been indicted by Mueller:
Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and Manafort's longtime deputy, Rick Gates.
Gates agreed to plead guilty to federal conspiracy and false-statement charges in February and began cooperating with investigators.
This person said Barrack was interviewed "months ago" and was asked a few questions about Gates' work on Trump's inaugural committee, which Barrack chaired,
person with knowledge of the Barrack interview said the questioning was broader and did include financial matters about the campaign, the transition and Trump's inauguration in January 2017.
Barrack has rare access and insight into Trump going back decades, since their days developing real estate.
Barrack played an integral role in the 2016 campaign as a top fundraiser at a time when many other Republicans were shunning the upstart candidate.
Barrack later directed Trump's inauguration.
Prosecutors' questions have been wide-ranging, these people said, touching on the
campaign's data operations,
its relationship with data-mining company Cambridge Analytica,
payments to Gates and
whether there were arrangements that weren't disclosed in filings to the Federal Election Commission
investigators' questions about the campaign's finances have come up in interviews dating to early fall while prosecutors were preparing the first indictment against Manafort and Gates.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ack/ar-AAwN7kC
Chris just needs to post nothing but Russian flags.
russian firm says...
All Russians bad because bad.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
