Active shooter at school outside of Houston

[boutons_deux]

[boutons_deux]

7K pairs of shoes cover Capitol lawn to honor kids killed in shootings since Sandy Hook

http://wlos.com/news/nation-world/sh...hool-shootings

you gun fellators have a LOT of kids' blood on your hands

[ducks]

Everyone with a brain: yes, it would have.

legally he could not have them


gun killings happen all the time where all guns are outlawed

I do not agree with McCain on much but this one thing
and insulting someone that does not agree with you is not classy

[ducks]

7K pairs of shoes cover Capitol lawn to honor kids killed in shootings since Sandy Hook

http://wlos.com/news/nation-world/sh...hool-shootings

you gun fellators have a LOT of kids' blood on your hands

you Hillary supporters more

[boutons_deux]

Hugh Hewitt says guns aren't problem, trench coats are.

[Blake]

you Hillary supporters more

How so

[Spurminator]

gun killings happen all the time where all guns are outlawed

No they don't. Where do you come up with this?

[spurraider21]

No they don't. Where do you come up with this?

probably dailywire

[Blake]

No they don't. Where do you come up with this?

Go easy on him English his not good

[RandomGuy]

legally he could not have them


gun killings happen all the time where all guns are outlawed

legally he could.

No, actually they don't "happen all the time", you slobbering idiot. the data on that is crystal ing clear. fewer guns = fewer mass shootings, fewest guns = fewest mass shootings

Awfully hard to have mass shootings without the tools to do so.

[RandomGuy]

In response to school shooting in Texas, Hugh Hewitt proposes a ban on trench coats
Hewitt says universal background checks and magazine bans “wouldn’t have any impact”

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2...h-coats/220263

Now it's trenchcoats. GMAFB

[boutons_deux]

NRA spokesperson suggests taking money from Planned Parenthood and spending it on more guns in schools

http://theweek.com/speedreads/774514/nra-spokesperson-suggests-taking-money-from-planned-parenthood-spending-more-guns-schools

[ducks]

Sounds good
They can spend 30 million in mid terms

[SpursforSix]

In response to school shooting in Texas, Hugh Hewitt proposes a ban on trench coats
Hewitt says universal background checks and magazine bans “wouldn’t have any impact”

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2...h-coats/220263

Now it's trenchcoats. GMAFB

Dude...you're one of the worst at taking things out of context and/or believing what you read by your chosen media outlets.

He was directly addressing this situation in regards to background check and magazine bans. They wouldn't have made a difference in this case.
And he was trying to make a point about recognizing patterns with these school shooters and addressing problems before they get to a shooting.
Not seriously proposing a ban on trenchcoats.

But MM pulls out a couple of talking points and you repost without actually researching what said and the context around it.

Of course both sides do this ad nauseam and the truth gets so distorted that anyone objectively trying to listen to news is going to have a tough time.

If you really want to make better, then you should abstain from participating in that kind of bull .

[ducks]

No they don't. Where do you come up with this?

laugh at what you do not agree with


America was founded on wanting to use guns to fight people

[RandomGuy]

Dude...you're one of the worst at taking things out of context and/or believing what you read by your chosen media outlets.

He was directly addressing this situation in regards to background check and magazine bans. They wouldn't have made a difference in this case.
And he was trying to make a point about recognizing patterns with these school shooters and addressing problems before they get to a shooting.
Not seriously proposing a ban on trenchcoats.

But MM pulls out a couple of talking points and you repost without actually researching what said and the context around it.

Of course both sides do this ad nauseam and the truth gets so distorted that anyone objectively trying to listen to news is going to have a tough time.

If you really want to make better, then you should abstain from participating in that kind of bull .

It is part and parcel of the excuses that conservatives use all the time to blame everything ELSE but guns, which was the point.

In context:

HEWITT: To the teachers and administrators out there, the trench coat is kind of a giveaway. You might just say, "No more trench coats." The creepy people, make a list, check it twice.

It was a non-sense solution, whether you go with "banning trenchcoats" or "making lists of creepy students".

How seriously do I need to treat nonsense like this? Do tell.

[SpursforSix]

It is part and parcel of the excuses that conservatives use all the time to blame everything ELSE but guns, which was the point.

In context:


It was a non-sense solution, whether you go with "banning trenchcoats" or "making lists of creepy students".

How seriously do I need to treat nonsense like this? Do tell.

He made an idiotic comment but to report that he is proposing a ban on trenchcoats is disingenuous.

[leemajors]

laugh at what you do not agree with


America was founded on wanting to use guns to fight people

what?

[101A]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._by_death_toll

[RandomGuy]

He made an idiotic comment but to report that he is proposing a ban on trenchcoats is disingenuous.

You might just say, "No more trench coats."

Doesn't seem too far off the mark. Again, why should I take this argument seriously at all? Does it deserve serious treatment, regardless of whether it is "make lists of creepy students" or "no more trench coats".

The person making the argument isn't serious himself. He knows he is saying something disingenuous.

Which is the better response, satire, or a wall of text treating this bull like it is worth serious consideration?

[RandomGuy]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._by_death_toll

This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

You really want to tally casualty counts? Really?

[SpursforSix]

Doesn't seem too far off the mark. Again, why should I take this argument seriously at all? Does it deserve serious treatment, regardless of whether it is "make lists of creepy students" or "no more trench coats".

The person making the argument isn't serious himself. He knows he is saying something disingenuous.

Which is the better response, satire, or a wall of text treating this bull like it is worth serious consideration?

Wait...is this another case of you pretending you posted something for a different reason than the obvious?
Are you going to start ignoring questions and asking everyone to think?

[ducks]

some schools have uniforms

have their been school shootings on them?

[RandomGuy]

Doesn't seem too far off the mark. Again, why should I take this argument seriously at all? Does it deserve serious treatment, regardless of whether it is "make lists of creepy students" or "no more trench coats".

The person making the argument isn't serious himself. He knows he is saying something disingenuous.

Which is the better response, satire, or a wall of text treating this bull like it is worth serious consideration?

Wait...is this another case of you pretending you posted something for a different reason than the obvious?
Are you going to start ignoring questions and asking everyone to think?

Nope.

Your turn.

Which is the better response, satire, or a wall of text treating this bull like it is worth serious consideration?

[SpursforSix]

Nope.

Your turn.

Which is the better response, satire, or a wall of text treating this bull like it is worth serious consideration?

The better response it to ignore that . It's just noise.