His group seemed to think the Spurs' response would be sure, whatever you want. Naive doesn't begin to describe that mindset.
Nothing just a joke
His group seemed to think the Spurs' response would be sure, whatever you want. Naive doesn't begin to describe that mindset.
If you're Boston or Philly do you want to see the Cavs get Leonard? There's an angle there and unless Leonard wants to not get paid next year he'll play.
Don't hate us cuz you ain't us.![]()
It would be naive to believe that Lebron will be waiting for Kawhi for a year, if Lebron wanted to be a Laker, he would have gone there when he was younger, he will only play Los Angeles if he can form a supertime, not because is the great Los Angeles Lakers
They'd be able to offer 4 years, $99 million under that scenario. But the Lakers don't have to stretch Deng to land James + PG13 and still be able to offer Leonard a four year, $130 million contract next summer. It would be funny though, because it would force them to salary dump at least one of Ingram/Ball this summer for absolutely nothing and salary dump their first round picks this year and next. And with one less asset to package with Deng it might be harder to move him next summer. They might just have to move Ingram + Ball + Deng in a salary dump this summer to get someone to take Deng's contract off their hands so that they could hold on to Kuzma at least in the long run if they're serious about holding a slot open for Leonard.
OK, I wouldn't be sure that signing those three is their plan tbh and it's hard to see the Spurs' keeping and playing Kancerwhi at this point. I'd kind of like to see the Spurs' just sitting Kahwi, but that just extends the fiasco. It's paradoxical, but it looks like the best way for the Spurs to salvage their reputation is to accommodate Kawhi in whatever way works best for them.
I disagree. Lakers have young talented players. Add in two top 10 players makes them contenders over Rockets even without Kawhi.
I rather have kawhi possibly sit then leave for nothing and have more money open up than take trash players
I think he goes to Philly before LA if he leaves. The Spurs are not dealing Leonard to a Western conference team, let alone the Lakers. If anything one would expect Philly to make a push for Leonard.
More cap space is usually for high paid free agents. Spurs need to look for draft picks or young players on cap friendly contracts. Rookie contracts with good to great potential is 2nd only to top 5 player signings.
I couldn't imagine anyone being so bitter to leave $100 million on the table.
Oh, there's no way they're keeping Kawhi. Once the Lakers are effectively blocked, though, other trade possibilities open, and better offers begin to flow in.
i'd keep him and give him lebron minutes.
The Clippers haul is the best, realistic resolution to this bull tbh. Unfortunately, Spurs only have about 24 hours to get it done. Otherwise, they better be prepared to hold him until the trade deadline.
The 'group' has already effectively walked away from $35M, and by saying 'Lakers only' are flirting with walking away from another $40M. They're easily that clueless.
Oh, and hi SW!
Hey, Kori. Crazy times...
Got tired of commiserating by myself.![]()
Not hard to see alternate scenario where Leonard plays last season, is Mr. Model Team Player, and the Spurs end up giving him the supermax. If he was concerned about what direction the Spurs would take after Pop retires then negotiate a player option. All signs point to his Uncle screwing things up badly which will end up costing Leonard a large amount.
" He has makes "
ducks is Kawhi sister ?
![]()
divisive rhetoric from leadership per par
His uncle has no experience doing this . I wouldn't expect a commercial banker, let alone a retail one to be able to represent an average NBA player, let alone a star.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)