Reply With Quote
It was an error. If you wanted to make it on purpose to make yourself look stupid, congratulations.It wasn't an error, it wasn't rocket science, it was the point
but good job figuring it out genius
you get a cookie
lel eat roe v wade
It was an error. If you wanted to make it on purpose to make yourself look stupid, congratulations.It wasn't an error, it wasn't rocket science, it was the point
but good job figuring it out genius
you get a cookie
20 Year Old Financier and Political Commentator | Conservative, Trump Supporter, Zionist | Writer for http://TheGatewayPundit.com
seems legit
Experts: Next SCOTUS Justice Will Spell End to Legal Abortion
Overturning Roe wouldn't outlaw abortions
Trump can already pardon himself
Only Dems want to force people to buy for profit products
Renato Mariotti
✔ renato_mariotti
Replying to renato_mariotti
We can be fairly confident that there are currently four votes to overturn Roe v. Wade on the Supreme Court—Thomas, Gorsuch, Roberts, and Alito. If President Trump selects a Supreme Court Justice similar to Gorsuch, that would be a fifth vote to overturn Roe.
11:17 AM - Jun 27, 2018
overturning Roe, if that happened, wouldn't make abortion illegal. it would just leave it up to the states.
Rent freeDarrin would approve of his understudy’s joke
it won’t happen
These are the kind of winning things that happen when we elect a Godly man who goes to church as much as he can. Always on Christmas. Always on Easter. Always when there's a major occasion. And during the Sundays. He's a Sunday church person. He goes when he can.
Republicans seek to hold confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee around Labor Day
From CNN's Ariane de Vogue
The Republicans’ goal — as of now — is to hold a confirmation hearing for a new Supreme Court nominee around Labor Day, a congressional source told CNN.
The goal is to get the nominee in place for the start of the fall term, which begins the first Tuesday in October, the source said.
its very important to chris for the government to tell millions of women all across the country what individual decisions they can and cant make
also i dont think roberts is a slam dunk to overturn roe
They won't. If they punt on cake baking they aren't going take on the storm of overturning Roe.
must protect those children that can not speak for themselves
if the mother would die I say aboration could be an option however with todays tech and medical knowledge that should not happen much
if woman do not spread their pussy they would not get pregnant and have a baby they do not want!
if woman carried gun they would not get raped they could blow the bad man or woman up that wanted to rape them!
left up to the states, before Roe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aborti...s_pre-1973.svg
Most of those green, blue, purple, yellow states would go red
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., changed his position in short order on whether the Senate chamber should take up the nomination of the next pick to sit on the Supreme Court before the midterm elections.
Blumenthal first told MSNBC he felt the Senate should not "artificially delay" a debate and vote on who will replace the retiring Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. Later Wednesday, however, he struck a different tone on Twitter:
chuck called him YOU DO AS I SAY OR NO MONEY FOR YOU!
So shoot the mother is the abortion you'd be for?
no shoot the would be raper who is trying to make the woman pregnant so she does not want an abortion
yup only people that get abortions are s and s.
and that is totally something that should factor into cons utional interpretation
Koch network gears up for the next Supreme Court vacancy
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.5eb556c8ec4e
Kock Bros bought Gorsuch a seat with $10Ms, now they plan to spend $10Ms more to buy Gorsuch 2.0, or worse, a seat.
The oligarchy owns and operates America, Americans need not bother to vote, both parties are totally corrupted by oligarchy $Bs and ignore voter preferences.
nothing wrong with protected sex
george soros spent more on elections
is it supreme court's job to tell people to wear condoms?
that the pregnancy could have been avoided either by abstinence or contraception is none of the court's business
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
