Young: sources tell @ExpressNews that Kawhi Leonard wants to be traded from Spurs

[Mugen]

yeah... why bring up the guy who said he wants to be traded and made it be known he wants to be a laker

completely different situations as PG is from Palmdale and Kawhi is from Riverside, absolutely not related at all

[FlAVaK]

just like your family agreed to let you your aunt

59,176 posts to finally make a good one

[coachmac87]

The Supermax will not be offered as Kawhi and Spurs have agreed to a trade.

Lay off the OxyContin you wanna be pharmacist

[iGetbuckets]

Lay off the OxyContin you wanna be pharmacist

[buttsR4rebounding]

You do realize that all that red has more cows than people right? You just used a map that shows the abundance of cow pies to try and illustrate your brain fart. Inbred.

Just because you say it doesn't make it true. In the US there are just under 100 million head of cattle including calves. A portion of those are in the blue areas. So the red areas have 90 million cattle give or take. The population of the US is around 312 million. while the blue areas are for the most part densely populated they do no represent the more than 200 million people. So at your next Hillary Clinton gathering you can finally answer the question "What's dumber than a brain-farting inbred?"

[Killakobe81]

yeah... why bring up the guy who said he wants to be traded and made it be known he wants to be a laker

Not that fact, but the risk of losing someone who is overrated and over paid.
Losing out on Kawhi if he is 100% healthy as FA would hurt.
Losing PG is more akin to getting outbid on Ebay for something you wanted but did not need. Even with PG via trade with no Ingram ...we probably still dont win a le. and he would take up 20-25 % of our cap ...

[FkLA]

Bernie 2020 tbh

[noles1983]

Just because you say it doesn't make it true. In the US there are just under 100 million head of cattle including calves. A portion of those are in the blue areas. So the red areas have 90 million cattle give or take. The population of the US is around 312 million. while the blue areas are for the most part densely populated they do no represent the more than 200 million people. So at your next Hillary Clinton gathering you can finally answer the question "What's dumber than a brain-farting inbred?"

You're right, they do however, represent at least half the country. Thanks for the 4H lesson though, your degree in Animal Husbandry is really paying off

[cd021]

3 million votes in cal that they do not even need to show id to vote


but must show id to get refund at walmart

CA does have the largest state population, you can't discount the result just because they voted against him

[Spur|n|Austin]

Get the politics BS out of here, there's an actual forum for that guff.

[SupremeGuy]

Just because you say it doesn't make it true. In the US there are just under 100 million head of cattle including calves. A portion of those are in the blue areas. So the red areas have 90 million cattle give or take. The population of the US is around 312 million. while the blue areas are for the most part densely populated they do no represent the more than 200 million people. So at your next Hillary Clinton gathering you can finally answer the question "What's dumber than a brain-farting inbred?"

Damn, don't kill him.

[Pavlov]

And by driving him into the ground, you mean selling him more of our uranium, right? you, commie.

lol you are stunningly ignorant.

[Amuseddaysleeper]

Bernie 2020 tbh

Watch "Who is America" which has Sacha Baron Cohen interviewing Bernie Sanders.

[MoSpur02]

Spurs signed small forward Dante Cunningham. Hmm..

[Ron Swanson]

This thread is already a mess without the re ed ing politics. Take that elsewhere.

[daslicer]

CA does have the largest state population, you can't discount the result just because they voted against him

I would say both CA and TX are statistical outliers since they are the two biggest states in America. If you don't count both of these states votes then Trump still loses the popular vote by a few hundred thousand. It goes to show you he's unpopular around the whole entire country.

[MoSpur02]

So as of now our small forwards are Kawhi, Gay, Cunningham, and perhaps Blossomgame correct?

[Gino20]

So as of now our small forwards are Kawhi, Gay, Cunningham, and perhaps Blossomgame correct?

I thought the Spurs are at 15 now with Dante?

[TimDunkem]

Hey Spurfan, what if I told you Derrick White and Kyle Anderson were "not expendable" in a trade for Anthony Davis?

I would believe it. Corporate knowledge and getting on your knees for Pop is what's important.

[Fusternino]

I thought the Spurs are at 15 now with Dante?

Yes we are. However, this is pending Manu's decision and BP3's contract isn't fully guaranteed until 8/1.

[rastaspur]

Stop talking about politics in here you stupid s.

[noles1983]

It's all good folks, we got something called a Dante Cunningham

[monkeypunk]

And by driving him into the ground, you mean selling him more of our uranium, right? you, commie.

Oh sorry, forgot to block your ing dumbass. Have fun greeting at Walmart until they fire you for touching yourself to your sisters panties.

[FireMicoHalili]

I agree even Ingram hasnt done all that much, yet.
Its gambling on the hot stock versus a tried and true longtern annuity ...
Though Lebron adds pressure and shortens our time-line I did not want to part with Ingram.
And as far as Maginka's "spin" (Magic has been unusually quiet overall) what should they say ...my guess is the trade speculation can have a negative affect on the team. So of course they gonna say they did not want to break up their "young core" what else are they supposed to say? Everyone but Ingram and Lebron is untouchable?! My guess part of the reason Randle wanted out (besides his ty agent) was the thought that in a contract year being third fiddle to a potential Lebron/KL would not be ideal going in to another big contract year. But instead of saying all than Pelinka says Randle was great, was our best player last year and though we wanted him back we werent willing to offer more than a one year deal because it would hamper our cap space in 2019.
you dont have to be a genius to cut through the BS and the spin.
IF Spurs really would just accept Kuzma a first and hart ...I think deal would be done. But my guess Spurs wanted more and since Lakers have been marketing Klye the spin is now Kuzma was off the table. Not saying they dont like or even love Kuzma. But I have a hard time buying that Kuzma/Hart and a first ..wouldnt be considered a "win" in a KL deal ...by the Lakers. probably an "L" for Spurs though.

All the ‘leverage’ was just a spin. It all comes down to a perception of value of the players being offered. I have a hard time thinking this is a win if that’s all the Lakers willingly part with. The Sixers package features a young and former All-Rookie Team player and an All-Defensive Team selection. Lakers offered a Summer League star and a sixth man at best, like you said.

[SupremeGuy]

lol you are stunningly ignorant.

lol no, you