The dog is real, the president not so much.
2. It really does matter if you're arguing for 'liberal' media. It's true that any exposure is good publicity, but you can't really claim 'liberal media' if they're thrashing her. Shes the new liberal hero of the minute. So those distinctions do matter.
3. I agree in the sense that the allegations are certainly more explosive, thus newsworthy.
4. The FBI internal report recommended demotion, but he was fired anyways. I'm not worried about Strzok, I think he'll publish a book and be fine. I'm more concerned about the politicization of the FBI (from both sides) that causes people to get fired for holding a political view (after all, we all have one, one way or the other). That's certainly newsworthy, but likely will get glossed over.
The dog is real, the president not so much.
Idle gossip is more newsworthy than an FBI agent tanking a felony investigation against the heir apparent to the presidency
Monoslob level political posting.
Both look like puppets, actually.![]()
So Trump is a real what?
She is a frkn liar who needs attention just like her mentor, our president.
A real president that protects his country, maybe you like mexicans and muslims since they look alike, care to give housing to some?
Protects his country....
By negotiations with North Korea and then making you think all is well?
Go sit in the corner with ducks ya fckn moron.
according to you she hasnt committed a single crime.
so whats the problem?
Well, feel free to waive it as idle gossip, tbh, but the allegation that she secretly recorded at the white house, and had some choice words for the sitting president, is, like I said, explosive.
Now, granted, I haven't read past the headlines on the topic, it's not the kind of news that interest me. But I will readily admit that they're the news that sell. And that goes for both liberals and conservatives.
Not my president!
Sounds like you're saying 'newsworthy' means ratings worthy. My bad; I thought the term was of more significance to you.Though, even still I completelyat your assessment. The Clinton story was HUGE; media obviously played it down.
I've never said that. Do you think that doing your sociopath chump impersonation gets you anywhere?
Well yeah, rating is king, we all know that. A lot of times what the vast majority if people want is not what I want or I'm interested in. That's ok, I'm aware of that, and I spend my time reading something else.
As far as the other case, it's not Clinton. She hasn't really been newsworthy since at least the elections. Being a loser will do that to you. Personally, as I've mentioned before, my concern is completely different to yours in that matter, but yeah, probably not a big seller.
The story goes back to her running, mate. The firing is just the latest development. Sure, if we're talking post-election only, your argument makes more sense.
Honestly surprised Derp hasnt speculated on Omarosa having a . Good work.
It's a chick, bruh. You lashing out cos you don't like the evidence...
Do you think she is more credible than Omarosa?
Let me hear the tape and then I’ll answer your question, sock puppet.
nicely done.
Skank Omorose with zero cred.
Indubitably
"Lynne Patton and I am a senior official in the Trump Administration"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)