Reply With Quote
Whenever they go on Hannity it's a verified nothing burger.
Where are the do entsToo stupid to realize you already quoted it smh
Whenever they go on Hannity it's a verified nothing burger.
Do top DOJ officials get demoted twice for nothingburgers?
What was the demotion for, TSA?
Too stupid to realize you already quoted it smhthinking I read or take Chuck Ross tweets seriously. I scrolled right past them but I entertained that tweet for the purpose of clarity and lo and behold, there was no link to the actual claim that said former FBI said what he said.
And the kicker, it was a partisan hack job that took place behind closed doors and not even under oath.
End results are in:
The source told Fox News that Moffa did not specifically confirm the practice of using leaked information to bolster warrant applications was employed with regard to the dossier. But, when pressed by the committees on whether this was common practice at the FBI, Moffa acknowledged the FBI had at least engaged in this activity in other cases. A government official, however, pushed back, saying that the account is incorrect and that Maffa did not testify to this.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-warrants.html
Dodge #1.
You dodged.
dude, he's asking you to clarify your question.
He has to ask Chuck Ross
From your own article
And the kicker, it was a partisan hack job that took place behind closed doors and not even under oath.
End results are in:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-warrants.html
“But House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Tuesday that the committee had evidence of the FBI’s practice that would be “hard to refute.”
“We know that some people at the Department of Justice and the FBI actually gave information to the media, then the stories were reported. Then they used those reports to justify further investigations,” Meadows said on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday. “You know, that’s like saying, we’re going to incriminate on one hand, and be the jury on the other. It just doesn’t work that way.”
No. He’s knows the answer. He’s just stalling and trying to take it to the weeds.
yes. it was a nothingburger.
And yet I go to my first post about them saying "we just learned new information" but won't show you specifics or even outline the facts in writing.From your own article
“But House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Tuesday that the committee had evidence of the FBI’s practice that would be “hard to refute.”
“We know that some people at the Department of Justice and the FBI actually gave information to the media, then the stories were reported. Then they used those reports to justify further investigations,” Meadows said on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday. “You know, that’s like saying, we’re going to incriminate on one hand, and be the jury on the other. It just doesn’t work that way.”
You still dont know what an unsubstantiated claim is vs what a fact is.
I mean, the FBI guy in question himself didn't confirmed what Meadow is propping up. It's all in the quotes.
lol won't be about the dossierFrom your own article
“But House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Tuesday that the committee had evidence of the FBI’s practice that would be “hard to refute.”
“We know that some people at the Department of Justice and the FBI actually gave information to the media, then the stories were reported. Then they used those reports to justify further investigations,” Meadows said on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday. “You know, that’s like saying, we’re going to incriminate on one hand, and be the jury on the other. It just doesn’t work that way.”
This is sure to be a big BOOM for the objective skeptics watching Sean Hannity. You can typically expect to see a massive public opinion shift after Hannity breaks a story.
Watching the muh Russia crew scramble to make sense of their crumbling narrative is going to provide months of entertainment
Just like #pizzagate fell apart for you?Watching the muh Russia crew scramble to make sense of their crumbling narrative is going to provide months of entertainment
Silsby?
Uranium One?
Seth Rich as Guccifer
Susan Rice indictment
Yep.
Will it be that bad, TSA?
You've said this before. Then you carefully cultivate your news bubble so you feel validated, conveniently forgetting each of your prior predictions and theories, while the rest of the world moves forward with reality.Watching the muh Russia crew scramble to make sense of their crumbling narrative is going to provide months of entertainment
Whatever gets you off. It's well past the point of pathetic, though.
TSA has been on so much on this board throughout the years that he thinks the golden glow on his skin is gold.
That's what you did since this thread started
My theory stands unchanged.
How many of your theories have come and gone in the past year and a half, TSA?
Serious question.
I don’t keep notes on what theories I throw out Pav.That's what you did since this thread started
My theory stands unchanged.
How many of your theories have come and gone in the past year and a half, TSA?
Serious question.
You pushed muh Russia and are now trying to distance yourself as fast as you can. It’s understandable but a chicken move. djohn is at least going down with the sinking ship with pride.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Posting Permissions
