after your immediate dodge it was tldr
I answered all your questions. Your turn.
Would the FBI/DOJ leaking information about a FISA application during an ongoing investigation be legal?
So the conspiracy was to leak false information and get caught.
Diabolical!
So shook you make no sense
What the are you even trying to say. Explain yourself.
It's not my fault your conspiracy theory makes no sense.So shook you make no sense
What the are you even trying to say. Explain yourself.
You stopped saying what your conspiracy theory was months ago because it changed several times and even you couldn't keep track of it.
I'd ask you what your conspitracy theory is again, but you'd just melt down and start talking about things that have nothing at all to do with it.
Leaking false information and getting caught was never my conspiracy theory. What the are you even trying to say. Explain yourself.It's not my fault your conspiracy theory makes no sense.
You stopped saying what your conspiracy theory was months ago because it changed several times and even you couldn't keep track of it.
I'd ask you what your conspitracy theory is again, but you'd just melt down and start talking about things that have nothing at all to do with it.
Naturally "media leak strategy" literally means "our strategy of leaking to the media" and couldn't possibly mean anything else.
What else would “discuss media leak strategy with DOJ” mean? This was texted the day before the WaPo revealed the Carter Page FISA. It was also the same WaPo author the FBI (McCabe/Page) admitted using to leak.
Would the FBI/DOJ leaking information about a FISA application during an ongoing investigation be legal?
Also, what erroneous narrative are you claiming I’m actively pushing?
I'm saying no one can say what your conspiracy theory is now because you changed it several times and shut up and whine every time anyone asks.
You'll never actually say what it is again.
Australia unveiled a climate change strategy today. We need to figure out what technology they've gotten ahold of that changes the climate.
What else would “discuss media leak strategy with DOJ” mean? This was texted the day before the WaPo revealed the Carter Page FISA. It was also the same WaPo author the FBI (McCabe/Page) admitted using to leak.
Would the FBI/DOJ leaking information about a FISA application during an ongoing investigation be legal?
I’ve said from the start it was an attempted set up to frame Russian collusion.I'm saying no one can say what your conspiracy theory is now because you changed it several times and shut up and whine every time anyone asks.
You'll never actually say what it is again.
Leaking false information and getting caught was never my conspiracy theory. You posted this immediately after more texts from Strzok were revealed. Explain yourself.
Man the up and admit you were duped for ’s sake.
These people from the FBI have already admitted to leaking to the media yet this time when they are texting about a media leak strategy with DOJ it doesn’t mean literally that
Also, question pending.
Would the FBI/DOJ leaking information about a FISA application during an ongoing investigation be legal?
Oh the irony.
Man the up and admit you were duped for ’s sake.
Imagine if he gets a deal and it’s full cooperation
This excerpt should clear up your latest nothingburger/propaganda:
Representatives Elijah mings (D-MD) and Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), ranking members on the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, respectively, issued a statement slamming Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) for spreading made-up conspiracy theories about the meaning behind just released text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
From the press release:
“Republicans in Congress repeatedly cherry-pick, mischaracterize, and then leak bits and pieces of do ents to fabricate conspiracy theories to protect President Trump, and this is just the latest example. The do ents clearly show that Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page were not discussing how to leak do ents to the press—but whether the Justice Department should change its regulations to stop leaks to the media. We don’t know how many times Republicans will try this same trick—or how many times President Trump will take advantage of them—but they need to start fulfilling their cons utional duty to conduct credible oversight of the Executive Branch rather than acting as the President’s personal defense counsel.”
Also, I gave you every bit of proof that is actually public knowledge you idiot. Just read the post - it gives you the proof that Trump conspired with Russia. Why you defend a traitor goes to show what kind of a citizen you are.
Thing is, there may not be concrete proof of Russian collusion that we know of, but there's also no proof that the FBI gave Hillary a pass and yet a few anti-Trump texts is all it takes for Trump loyalists to be convinced.
Trump has regularly tweeted things that are more suspect of obstruction than any of the Strzok/Page texts. This is of no concern, though, to the Reddit/4chan obsessives like TSA.
You think it's mental gymnastics because you're so locked-in to the reality you've created for yourself after probably a little YEAR spent obsessing over this stuff. You can't see any other possibilities even if it's the more logical and realistic.
Man the up and admit you were duped for ’s sake.
What intel do you think they were talking about leaking? What proof do you have that he was a source for that intel?
And when you're wrong about this one you're just going to move on to the next Trump-servicing conspiracy theory and pretend you never brought it up. And if you do mention it again, you'll just say something stupid like "Derrr but at least I din bet on it."
Ah. It is finally revealed where TSA is coming off with and drafting off of.
Of course.
But that wasn't a leak anyways. Poor TSA.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote