I had you figured for a mother er, didn't think you were white though.
i did
this is your white flag every time.You're getting awfully close to taking a stance. Better tread lightly.
I had you figured for a mother er, didn't think you were white though.
Changes my post
Claims victory
today's Philo
You're babbling nonsense.
I've got it just fine. You'll never say what you think it means so you pretend you're smart.
Poor stupid Chris.
No . Trumpies like you can't help it.
It seems the EC comes under attack when you don’t get the outcome you want.
Your team goes with vote fraud when you lose.
People that want to abolish the EC either have an agenda, or are simply misinformed.
All presidential electors are chosen by the voters.
Almost anyone can be an elector.
Only 2 states run proportional representation as opposed to the winner take all system.
People that want to abolish the EC either have an agenda, or are simply misinformed.
The electors are subject to corruption just like anyone else.
HRC still can't figure out why she lost.
People that voted for HRC are malleable, and will adopt any policy she promotes no matter how radical it is.
People that want to abolish the EC either have an agenda, or are simply misinformed.
Or maybe people just have a differing opinion... whether somebody thinks the system is fair or not doesn't have to be connected to Shillary at all, tbh...
Heck, I'm fairly confident if Trump would've won the popular vote but lost the election, you'd be calling to abolish the EC...
Considering all the illegal voters and DNC corruption at the polls, I'm fairly confident Trump won the popular vote regardless of what the numbers say. If Trump would have lost the election, I doubt any rational Conservative would want to abolish the Electoral College. This is a knee jerk reaction reserved for the Radical Left.
It's not all a conspiracy, tbh... someday you'll have to come to grips with that.
i'll just bet you are
Yea, it is. I live in California. I know they're pretty much bending over backwards to allow illegals to vote. Then these assholes release their reports saying it's all on the up. You don't have to come to grips with that. I suspect you won't.
Prove your claim.
Prove it.
But that wouldn't be illegal either. You know where the problem stems? That the Cons ution never framed who has a right to vote. It was left to the states to decide that (in large part because originally only white land owners were allowed to, but let's skip past the racial undertones). Eventually women were enfranchised, and then racial minorities.
Even then, California is just one state, solidly blue at that, and there's more to it than just illegals (if you live there, you know exactly what I mean).
Is it really surprising Democrats continually win the popular vote? It's only been happening for how many presidential elections? Urbanites far outnumber rural folks. It's not even a dig at Trump, same happened with Bush-Gore.
"Eventually women were enfranchised, and then racial minorities."
nope
1870: Non-white men and freed male slaves are guaranteed the right to vote by the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Cons ution.
1920: Women are guaranteed the right to vote by the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Cons ution. In practice, the same restrictions that hindered the ability of poor or non-white men to vote now also applied to poor or non-white women.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting..._United_States
Sorry, you're correct it was the 15th first, then the 19th.
That said, some women were already able to vote legally in select States before 1920. The Nineteenth amendment simply made it mandatory for every State. It's on the link you posted.
And the point I made still stands: There's no right to vote granted by the Cons ution, it's left to the States. The 15th and 19th Amendment actually don't grant any new rights directly, they simply forbid States from disallowing voting disenfranchisement on the basis of color, race and sex.
Chrispiracy!
Derpspiracy!
Summary
Red Team stance:
There are quite a few undesirable lazy poor people who If vote, will swing the direction of blue team who promise handouts.
Blue team stance:
There are large numbers of disenfranchised who do not vote. We need to get them to the polls anyway possible as they are more likely to vote our way. Because they don’t have a strong political voice we will not need to cater to them after we are in office. Just get them to the polls and push blue. If they do actually participate further than the elections they might go too far asking for too much.
smh... I'm not skipping this election, I can't vote bro.. that's not my choice.. Brazilians will elect who the they want.
Brazil is a ing mess, if they go haddad PT stays in power, corruption will continue like crazy and they will kill lava jato operation... Bolsonaro is indeed Trump but in worst with a risk to see army taking over once again the country.
I'm sad for the Brazilians tbh.. they are so ed. I love Brazil and living there, this country is a blast but if things go south I'll come back home.. it is quite selfish but there is not much I can do
Understand. Its sad that brazilians want to escape their own country but its understandable. You cant even make up that kind of mess
If Trump or some other re like lery/Rubio(or even Haley good lord) are elected in 2020 I myself am also escaping this American hole
Probably going to New Zealand. Sure they are american puppets but they still possess some civility and are not completely controlled by Israel
If biden is elected Id probably stay for the lolz![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)