Page 24 of 257 FirstFirst ... 142021222324252627283474124 ... LastLast
Results 576 to 600 of 6407
  1. #576
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Hey ducks.

    You have no friends and no one likes you. You are the most unintelligent person most of us will ever encounter.

    You're a piece of . Go yourself.

  2. #577
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    Clinton should keep talking she helps the red wave

  3. #578
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    “Trump rapes hotter chicks than you get” is seriously your retort?
    Says the mark cuban lover
    That said stock market crash with trump

  4. #579
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    You pee on underage girls
    Got proof?
    Since the answer is no be quiet

  5. #580
    Believe. Othyus Lalanne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    2,150
    Lame defense.

    Hey ducks.

    You have no friends and no one likes you. You are the most unintelligent person most of us will ever encounter.

    You're a piece of . Go yourself.
    What pussy would care about his social status over here?

  6. #581
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    WATCH: MSNBC's Morning Joe Slams Democrats For 'Moving The Goal Posts' On Giving Kavanaugh's Accuser A Hearing

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/36068...mpaign=dwbrand

  7. #582
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377

  8. #583
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377

  9. #584
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377

  10. #585
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908
    Jessica Leeds
    Ivana Trump
    Jill Harth
    Kristen Anderson
    Cathy er
    Temple Taggart
    Karena Virginia
    Jennifer Murphy
    Rachel Crooks
    Natasha Stoynoff
    Ninni Laaksonen
    Jessica Drake
    Summer Zervos
    Cassandra Searles
    Cool, now show me the convictions for each since sexual assault is a crime.

    among others.
    Who are the others? Your mom?

    Anything besides links to convictions are either: accusations or theory.

    Thanks in advance.

  11. #586
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908

  12. #587
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908
    mono does the tap-out thing

  13. #588
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    Chris and duxx are super shook.

  14. #589
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    What pussy would care about his social status over here?
    Who said over here?

  15. #590
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    'Beyond Shameful': Attempting to Put Victim on Trial, Collins Wants to Let Kavanaugh's Lawyer Question His Accuser

    "Collins seems to have forgotten that Brett Kavanaugh is the one who has been accused of a crime, not Christine Blasey Ford."

    Collins sent a letter calling on the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow Kavanaugh's counsel to cross-examine Ford during Monday's scheduled hearing.

    Ultraviolet founder Shaunna Thomas
    added:

    "This is not a trial. It is Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault hearing and

    a job interview for the highest court in the land, and

    the burden of proof is solely on Brett Kavanaugh."

    giving Kavanaugh's lawyer time to grill and possibly slime Ford would be a distraction from the actual purpose of Monday's hearing:

    To decide whether Kavanaugh is fit to serve on the Supreme Court.


    The goal of these next Senate hearings is to determine whether Kavanaugh can be trusted to make decisions about our most fundamental freedoms—and the verdict is already an overwhelming no."

    https://www.commondreams.org/news/20...anaughs-lawyer

    K is a petty rat er Repug partisan, not a judge with a distinguished judicial career.

    K is another example of how the oligarchy is degrading, rigging govt to oligarchy's benefit.

    If not K, then Federalist assholes have many rat ing K clones in the wings.

    America is ed and un able.





  16. #591
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    ^^ accusers should not be allowed to be questioned?
    GTFO.


    Burden of proof is on Kavanaugh? Ah no you don't have to "prove" what you did not do.

    Burden of proof is on accuser.

  17. #592
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Hey ducks.

    You have no friends and no one likes you. You are the most unintelligent person most of us will ever encounter.

    You're a piece of . Go yourself.
    snowflake epic meltdown

  18. #593
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Says the mark cuban lover
    That said stock market crash with trump

  19. #594
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    ^^ accusers should not be allowed to be questioned?
    GTFO.


    Burden of proof is on Kavanaugh? Ah no you don't have to "prove" what you did not do.

    Burden of proof is on accuser.
    She has said all she's going to say, while admitting missing details, but not who violently tried to rape her and who was in the room, probably for sloppy seconds.

    Misogynist Repugs want to drag her before Congress so they can slanderously Anita-Hill her.
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-20-2018 at 09:21 AM.

  20. #595
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    , but no who violenlty tried to rape her and who was in the room,
    This is an example of why cross exam is necessary.

  21. #596
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    Boo, there is no way they would "Anita Hill" her in the age of MeToo with an election coming up.

    They would use a female attorney and softball question her, but if she refuses even that then they need to put this down as an unsubstantiated, questionable allegation and move on with a vote to confirm.

  22. #597
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,927
    CC predicts Republicans will use kid gloves on Ford

  23. #598
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    CC predicts Republicans will use kid gloves on Ford
    and a female attorney.

    No Senator is gonna want to question her.

  24. #599
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,927
    we'll see or we won't.

    is there a precedent for Senators using outside counsel to question people at hearings?

    would such a person even have standing to speak?

  25. #600
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    we'll see or we won't.

    is there a precedent for Senators using outside counsel to question people at hearings?

    would such a person even have standing to speak?
    My bet is that they won't need to, as she will refuse to testify under oath.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •