So you can't think of one good thing he did after trying to brag about it.
![]()
you can easily look all this up and not even on google but here on ST where you have participated in said threads. you're a blowhard got pavTHETIC and just like pavlovian theory goes you're the dumbass dog drooling and that bell is the ideology you subscribe to where nothing but pussy men like yourself flock to.
So you can't think of one good thing he did after trying to brag about it.
![]()
why is it my job to do your job? this is an issue with you always. as well, you didn't ask me to help hold your hand so what exactly are you going on about? you're a child!
Poor kid.
It's not my job to back up your claim.
lol kori
This is a wonderful example of brainwashing.
Hundreds of thousands of cases where the women told the truth and were legitimately sexually assaulted.
Your cult leader - makes up a preposterous lie that this (women lying) is suddenly some great problem in our society and you swallow it whole.
A person who was not brainwashed would 99 times out of 100 conclude:
"Hmm - hundreds of thousands of cases - VS. Trump & Kavanaugh?"
Hmm - obviously - Trump & Kavanaugh are liars and sexual assaulters - especially with all the evidence presented- yup - Trump & Kavanaugh are sexual assaulters!"
A brainwashed person would conclude:
"Hmm dear leader denies it - let me go out and find ONE example where women lied!"
Brainwashing. Sad. Bigly Sad.
![]()
The problem is too many liberals have made this an easy argument by insisting on hashtag-friendly causes like "Believe All Survivors."
For every conservative who is a kneejerk skeptic of women who come forward with claims of assault, there is a liberal who believes that women would never lie about being assaulted (an argument that comes directly to blows with many examples in the Jim Crow era of white women claiming to have been assaulted by black men.)
Women should be heard and respected, but due process is still paramount. When you set the expectation that every woman who claims to have been assaulted is telling the truth, that bar cannot be cleared by the reality of a nation with 300+ million people, and examples like this high school student (which are the exception, not the norm) become easy targets to contradict the effort.
This is false.
That is not what is being said. You can believe the allegation, respect the victim and then conduct a proper investigation where the truth and the facts can be found. If the allegations are false - then the accuser can be prosecuted.
The Kavanaugh thing was nothing but a coverup - start to finish. There was PLENTY of corroboration and cir stantial evidence to call this a credible allegation.
Every time an idiot says: "there was zero evidence"
Those were blatant lies - which other idiots parroted - and an entire brainwashed nation parroted that same idiocy.
A real investigation would have gotten very close to what happened to Dr. Ford - which is plain to see - which is Kavanaugh and his buddy attacked her in a drunken state and could not remember. His friend probably remembers it - but he was allowed to get off the hook of a real FBI interrogation.
Impeachment will be a proper thing to do and those cowardly Dems better not shrink from the job.
I agree that can be done, I disagree that it's all people want. Many of the most vocal proponents, unfortunately, demand action and consequences before due process can even take place. (You may argue that losing a job is not the same as prosecution and imprisonment but it's still a consequence that is difficult to overcome, and it does happen.)
I think you're projecting your more reasonable view of the issue onto all liberals. Unfortunately, not everyone shares (or can afford to share, in the case of many businesses) your cautious approach.
The Kavanaugh debacle was a disaster for Democrats. They would be stupid to revisit it with impeachment efforts, but I don't doubt they are stupid enough to do it. Fundamentally, most of America doesn't think we should penalize or investigate someone (particularly white men) for their actions in high school 36 years ago.The Kavanaugh thing was nothing but a coverup - start to finish. There was PLENTY of corroboration and cir stantial evidence to call this a credible allegation.
Every time an idiot says: "there was zero evidence"
Those were blatant lies - which other idiots parroted - and an entire brainwashed nation parroted that same idiocy.
A real investigation would have gotten very close to what happened to Dr. Ford - which is plain to see - which is Kavanaugh and his buddy attacked her in a drunken state and could not remember. His friend probably remembers it - but he was allowed to get off the hook of a real FBI interrogation.
Impeachment will be a proper thing to do and those cowardly Dems better not shrink from the job.
"for their actions in high school 36 years ago."
For me, the impeachable offenses are his lying to Congress to snag both Federal judgeships, totally verified as liar.
There are plenty of witnesses that say he was a drunken party animal, not his LIE that he was serious person / altar boy.
That he is emotionally unsuitable is secondary, but hard to prosecute.
That he was a sexual predator, and childish besotted, drunken party animal 35 years ago is certainly big black mark on his character (Ms of young men did not behave either way), but too old.
K is a rat ing Repug bag, but that's what the oligarchy wants on SCOTUS, which is now fully degraded to the oligarchy's benefit, and for decades.
If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon.
Which is true so....??
It sure made derp hate black people.
Somehow "she could've been my daughter" or "I could have been his father" doesn't inspire near the pearl-clutching when it comes from white people. What a stupid thing to still be mad about.
List everything corroborated. It should be a long list since you claim PLENTY was corroborated.
I’ll mention you whenever I want. You aren’t being forced to reply. I’ve got 2,998 unchecked notifications, exercise some self control.
Is djohn ever coming back?
It was stoking racial tensions.
Oh, just you wait.
Obama knew this issue was being sold on racial injustice in the media.
Sociopath pretending to not understand.
No, how specifically did that statement trigger you?
The media wasn't trying to stoke racial flames?
Today's sociopath
You can't say how?
OK. It was a pretty stupid thing for you to say in the first place.
Skip Gates, Ferguson, Trayvon.
it was unforgivably racist for Obama not to back the blue.
his comments and negative coverage of police in the media drove a wedge between blacks and whites that did not previously exist.
Everything points to it; but you have your own sociopath truth at the end of the day.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)