So you're opposed to Trump's forcing him and Stealth Jeff out?you’ve been claiming this for two years and it’s never come true
Yes or no.
From cheering this on to well do you oppose it in record time
One can not cheer on and not be opposed at the same time. Asking Sessions to resign was a smart move after the Dems took the house. No point in having an AG who has to recuse from every single investigation the house Dems bring. Rosenstein hasn’t resigned.
From cheering this on to well do you oppose it in record time
One can not cheer on and not be opposed at the same time. Asking Sessions to resign was a smart move after the Dems took the house. No point in having an AG who has to recuse from every single investigation the house Dems bring. Rosenstein hasn’t resigned.
TSA breaks out the kneepads in record time.
Why?
What does Trump have to hide?
Be specific.
Trash can't show his tax records, because they are very complex, and IRS is STILL auditing them. (he said today in his MESS conference)
TSA breaks out the kneepads in record time.
Why?
What does Trump have to hide?
Be specific.
Smart move!
One doesn’t have to have anything to hide to want an AG that doesn’t have to recuse from every bull investigation the house Dems try and bring. You aren’t very smart if you are seriously asking these questions.
TSA breaks out the kneepads in record time.
Why?
What does Trump have to hide?
Be specific.
Would it be a smart move to keep Sessions on knowing the house Dems are going to be bringing more Russia investigations and knowing Sessions would have to recuse? Yes or no.
Why? It's no big deal because Trump did nothing wrong and he's going to declassify the FISA stuff any day now like he could have a year and a half ago.
Yes, since you think Trump did nothing wrong and he's going to declassify the FISA stuff any day now like he could have a year and a half ago and the Clinton/Podesta/Obama/Rice military tribunals will start any day now.Would it be a smart move to keep Sessions on knowing the house Dems are going to be bringing more Russia investigations and knowing Sessions would have to recuse? Yes or no.
lol
Well duh.
Did you think this was some kind of revelation?
(a) (1). Being a witness to a case clearly makes Clovis substantially involved in how the investigation is conducted, and "the subject" here is not referencing a person, but the subject of the investigation/prosecution.
That's certainly your opinion and I never claimed he would. You asked what was the regulation, that's the regulation.
Shows what a Session is, tbh. Imp should've been canned a long time ago.i know its common to be offered the opportunity to resign in lieu of quitting, butat including that in the resignation letter
The only thing I'm wondering is how much of that hour fifty-two minute video you bothered to watch before posting it.
Frontline is an easy watch tbh.
Derp, have you never watch an episode of Frontline?
Frontline is an easy watch tbh.
Derp, have you never watch an episode of Frontline?
Derp, have you ever watched an episode of Frontline?
Derp, have you ever watched an episode of Frontline?
Yes or no.
Clovis “was” a witness. Unless he’s being called upon again to testify your point is bunk. And even if you think (a) (1) applies who would be the supervisor over Whitaker who would need to clear him to not recuse under section (b)?
His recusal isn’t mandatory like the tweet claimed no matter how you look at it, that was my point.
If Mueller clears Trump and says no collusion with Russia do you think the house Dems stop investigating Trump/Russia?
Maybe not, but none of it matter since you think neither Trump nor anyone around him did anything wrong and the news will be dominated by the Clinton/Podesta/Obama/Rice military tribunals you said will begin soon.
lol derp shut down again.
Former Kavanaugh colleague among group being considered to replace Sessions as AG: reports
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/for...-as-ag-reports
So if the house Dems continued to open Trump/Russia investigations even after Mueller said no Trump/Russia collusion you think it would be a smart move to keep a recused Session as AG and let the bull investigations continue to hamper the Presidency?
Asked and answered, TSA.
Since you think they're all bull and say all the military tribunals prosecuting Democrats will start soon enough, what's the problem?
Be specific.
You never answered how that would be a smart move to keep an AG on that would have to recuse from bull investigations after Mueller cleared Trump. How would that be smart to allow an administration to be hampered fighting bull investigations? Be specific.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote