Reply With Quote
hard to see how oppo research lacks legitimacy per se. a oppo research against HRC has been used in this forum -- and in this thread -- to bolster shrill cries to LOCK HER UP.
IIRC there was a lawsuit at some point
hard to see how oppo research lacks legitimacy per se. a oppo research against HRC has been used in this forum -- and in this thread -- to bolster shrill cries to LOCK HER UP.
her emails
her blackberries
her servers
her foundation
her late nite pizza
Benghazi for six years running...WHERE ARE THE INDICTMENTS?
lawsuit pending
muellers indictments will bolster their case when it is shown that the election results are fraudulent
How would they possibly show that? Be specific
this lawsuit?
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...hacking-693965
This one is still active, I believe:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demo...ian_Federation
wait for the indictments linking the
hacked emails>russian troll farm>trump moscow tower>russians sanctions>russian $$$> trump agreeing to sell out the usa>
thanks, man.
says Gates cooperated, if I read that right. lotta moving parts, racketeering cases are hard to prove.
it's hard to imagine a judge overturning an election as a civil remedy.
It’s a civil lawsuit, so they’re probably only after money and possibly a referral to a criminal case if warranted. IIRC, the DNC also scored monies on a similar suit against Nixon back in the day.
Trump lawyer threatens his will be the last word over Mueller: ‘Damn right there will be a Giuliani report’
Giuliani offered his analysis of Donald Trump’s detractors.
“These people are on a moral high ground,” he argued. “They can just any means for their end, which is to save the country from Donald Trump and put it in the hands of Hillary Clinton or someone else.”
“When does this end?” Hannity asked Rudy Giuliani.
“It ends when he files his report and we can answer it,” he replied.
“Will there be a Giuliani report?” Hannityasked.
“Damn right there be a Giuliani report,” he answered. “Our report will be the definitive report.”
“The president did nothing wrong,” Giuliani argued.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/tru...uliani-report/
Solomon’s sources are good and thanks for the drive by white flag
anonymous sources good now
how could you possibly be sure?
are you John Solomon?
His track record concerning the investigation speaks for itself.
What is his track record?
Better than McClatchy
can you be more specific?
Compare and contrast.
In an interview on MSNBC, Greg Gordon said that he and his McClatchy colleague, Peter Stone, did not physically see cell tower records and intelligence intercepts that they claim placed Cohen in Prague in summer 2016.
Gordon also suggested that the four anonymous sources he and Stone cite in their article also did not see the intelligence for themselves, meaning that the report is based on third-hand information.
Michael Flynn was collecting intelligence on Russia for the United States during his Russia Today dinner while certain people here said he was committing treason at the same dinner.
you agree with his reporting, is all
If you can't see the difference in the reporting there is not much more to discuss
You like Solomon because he sucks up to Trump and stokes your Michael Flynn superspy fantasies. confirmation bias, in a word.
I'm not personally invested in McClatchy being wrong or Solomon being right: you are.
gtfo
on behalf of who?
and
why would russia PAY him to attend - so that he could collect intel on russia?
I like Solomon because he has solid sources that he actually vets and his reporting is continuously corroborated.
Michael Flynn being a spy isn't a fantasy.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions