Women who left to marry ISIS s and now want back.

[Pavlov]

And I have not listed an opinion either. I'm not the one who is too chicken to do that.

I posted my opinion.

Eh, if she's a citizen, bring her back and put her on trial, like Trump wants other countries to do.

You're saying you're brave for not posting your opinion?


are you drunk?

[Avant]

I posted my opinion.


You're saying you're brave for not posting your opinion?


are you drunk?

Pavlov, don't you ever get bored with being a pest? Dude, what is with this of seeing if you can bug someboby? Start a thread guy, do something else, can you?

[Spurtacular]

I voted present

[Pavlov]

You didn't vote and you didn't express an opinion.

[koriwhat]

You didn't vote and you didn't express an opinion.

you didn't vote either and your opinions are always ! plus these dumb s and hang 'em high!

[Spurtacular]

You didn't vote and you didn't express an opinion.

Yup, I am voting present 'til further notice. I'm not the one in denial.

[Pavlov]

Yup, I am voting present 'til further notice. I'm not the one in denial.

scared

[Chris]

ISIS

[Spurtacular]

scared

I haven't formulated a stance. I own it. You on the other hand like to say you do, but you yet you're only voting present. I think we know who is scared.

[Pavlov]

I haven't formulated a stance. I own it. You on the other hand like to say you do, but you yet you're only voting present. I think we know who is scared.

I stated my stance.

Very plainly.

You're just too stupid to realize it.

How many years do you need to formulate a stance?

10?

20?

[Spurtacular]

I stated my stance.

Very plainly.

You're just too stupid to realize it.

How many years do you need to formulate a stance?

10?

20?

If your stance is so solid, then register it in the poll. Don't be so scared.

[Pavlov]

If your stance is so solid, then register it in the poll. Don't be so scared.

Tell me which choice in the poll matches my stance as you understand it.

[Spurtacular]

Tell me which choice in the poll matches my stance as you understand it.

You're afraid to register a vote. Par.

[Pavlov]

You're afraid to register a vote. Par.

I don't see a choice that matches my stance.

Tell me which choice in the poll matches my stance.

Unless you're afraid -- in which case you are afraid of three things: voting, taking a stance and answering a simple question.

Show me how afraid you are.

Lash out.

[Spurtacular]

I don't see a choice that matches my stance.

Tell me which choice in the poll matches my stance.

Unless you're afraid -- in which case you are afraid of three things: voting, taking a stance and answering a simple question.

Show me how afraid you are.

Lash out.

The media and Obama supported ISIS. I would not want to punish everyday people and let the elites have a pass unless some specific charges for crimes against humanity can be leveled. It hardly seems fair to have the double standard. What charge(s) do you think should be leveled against ISIS wives?

[Pavlov]

The media and Obama supported ISIS. I would not want to punish everyday people and let the elites have a pass unless some specific charges for crimes against humanity can be leveled. It hardly seems fair to have the double standard. What charge(s) do you think should be leveled against ISIS wives?

She could possibly be charged with material support of terrorism and conspiracy.

Also CROFL your "stance" -- it makes no sense at all.

[Spurtacular]

She could possibly be charged with material support of terrorism and conspiracy.

Also CROFL your "stance" -- it makes no sense at all.

"Could possibly" -- Strong stance there, psychopav. Could you be any more of a wimp on the matter?

[Pavlov]

'Could possibly' -- Strong stance there, psychopav. Could you be any more of a wimp on the matter?

I'm not a lawyer, dip . I took the word of lawyers that charges are indeed a possibility in this particular case of the Alabama woman. If she's willing to come back to face those kinds of charges, who am I to stop her?

I had to scare your pathetic stance out of you.

wimpy scared but ultimately obedient derp

[Spurtacular]

I'm not a lawyer, dip . I took the word of lawyers that charges are indeed a possibility in this particular case of the Alabama woman. If she's willing to come back to face those kinds of charges, who am I to stop her?

I had to scare your pathetic stance out of you.

wimpy scared but ultimately obedient derp

The things you tell yourself. You scare nobody. You could not be more of a wimp. Your stance isn't even a stance. I can now see why you wouldn't vote.

[Pavlov]

The things you tell yourself. You scare nobody. You could not be more of a wimp. Your stance isn't even a stance. I can now see why you wouldn't vote.

Of course it's a stance.

If they're citizens, let them back in the country and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

Your stance is to let them get away with anything including helping to kill American soldiers because you hated Black President.

derp

[Spurtacular]

Of course it's a stance.

If they're citizens, let them back in the country and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

Your stance is to let them get away with anything including helping to kill American soldiers because you hated Black President.

derp

What law do you think they broke and what is that full extent of punishment? You cannot say cos you're giving beauty contest answers. You don't have a stance.

And my stance is that America aided and set up ISIS. It hardly seems fair to hold one class to account and not the other. I did not grant any sort of direct immunity; I did say prosecute based on any exact crimes should any be given. But no, I'm not too bothered by who someone marries otherwise.

[Pavlov]

What law do you think they broke and what is that full extent of punishment? You cannot say cos you're giving beauty contest answers. You don't have a stance.

And my stance is that America aided and set up ISIS. It hardly seems fair to hold one class to account and not the other. I did not grant any sort of direct immunity; I did say prosecute based on any exact crimes should any be given. But no, I'm not too bothered by who someone marries otherwise.

You got scared into directly contradicting yourself.

[koriwhat]

If they're citizens, let them back in the country and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

what a weak stance but you're a weak man so this isn't out of the norm for you.

[Pavlov]

what a weak stance but you're a weak man so this isn't out of the norm for you.

What's weak about prosecuting them?

What do you think should be done with them?

[koriwhat]

What's weak about prosecuting them?

What do you think should be done with them?

1) you're weak and so is your stance.

2) if you could read i already answered your stupid ing question and contributed to the poll that you didn't. ing re !

ps: 2) you and i already had a back and forth over my stance so you're more of a re than i thought you were originally.