Reply With Quote
What are they doing differently?
lol
What are they doing differently?
TSA's trying to go back to the dry well again.
You're not even going to try to watch a captioned video, are you?
pussy
poor fella can't even muster up enough courage to give an opinion. Sad.
I gave my opinion based on Nadler's interview, which you're too much of a pussy to watch. Sad. Poor fella.
And when asked to expound on it you clam up, like a pussy.
only the best
What's to expound upon? Nadler said they spoke with the SCO and SDNY so they don't interfere.
It's right there in the interview you're too much of a pussy to watch.
Sad.
Poor fella.
Pussy.
How does a ST thread get 1500 pages in under 2 years?
And there goes the goalpost. We weren’t discussing any interference. You said they weren’t investigating the same things as the SCO and SDNY.
Is the Atlantic article wrong?
Watch the video.
Why won't you watch the captioned video, pussy?
Why not?
I wouldn't doubt that some of things the SCO and SDNY will be brought up.
Why wouldn't they?
Your whole narrative is that the Democrats have no faith in either the SCO or the SDNY and are just calling for panic hearings because that's what you want to believe.
That's just wrong.
Sorry.
Poor fella.
Sad.
Pussy.
No you don’t doubt that some of the same things will be brought up
Name something new Nadler is investigating that the SCO or SDNY have not investigated.
No you don’t doubt that some of the same things will be brought up
Name something new Nadler is investigating that the SCO or SDNY have not investigated.
Poor fella.
Sad.
Pussy.
Mueller’s reply to Manaforts memo about his sentence is really something
lol Manafort done ed up again
Yet you claimed to know they were investigating different things than the SCO/SDNY.
Because I watched the interview with the chair of the judicial committee.
If you're never going to watch it and be a pussy forever, just say so.
Are you going to be a pussy forever?
Yes or no.
Yes I know you watched it and yes I know you’re too scared to give your take on it.
I gave my take on it every time you asked me. My take is he explained what they are doing just fine.
Question pending:
If you're never going to watch it and be a pussy forever, just say so.
Are you going to be a pussy forever?
Yes or no.
Judge says Roger Stone used court filings to plug his book
Stone flirts with jail time for a new book introduction and an Instagram post that may violate his gag order.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson
accused former Trump campaign aide Roger Stone of using a court motion to sell books, in a remarkable court order on Tuesday.
The judge lit into Stone and his lawyers for not telling the court sooner about his forthcoming book, “The Myth of Russian Collusion” — a new, renamed edition of “The Making of the President 2016,”
with an introduction that is highly critical of special counsel Robert Mueller and the ongoing investigation into Russian election meddling.
“Defendant’s March 4 submission gives rise to the impression that the March 1 motion —
which purported to have been submitted ‘in an abundance of caution’ …
was intended to serve as a means to generate additional publicity for the book,”
Jackson wrote.
https://thinkprogress.org/judge-says...-44869fc09eef/
There are currently 13 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 13 guests)
Posting Permissions
