Reply With Quote
Insurance policy backfire
The Justice Department is reportedly preparing to go after the author of Trump-Russia dossier
Source: Politico
By NATASHA BERTRAND 04/17/2019 06:47 PM EDT Updated 04/17/2019 08:25 PM EDT
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...rtment-1280578The frenzied anticipation around special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report has overshadowed another Justice Department report on the Russia probe that could land as soon as next month, and which will likely take direct aim at the former British spy behind an infamous “dossier” on President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.
For the past year, the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, has been examining the FBI’s efforts to surveil a one-time Trump campaign adviser based in part on information from Christopher Steele, a former British MI6 agent who had worked with the bureau as a confidential source since 2010.
Several people interviewed by the Inspector General’s office over the past year tell POLITICO that Horowitz’s team has been intensely focused on gauging Steele’s credibility as a source for the bureau. One former U.S. official left the interview with the impression that the Inspector General’s final report “is going to try and deeply undermine” Steele, who spent over two decades working Russia for MI6 before leaving to launch his own corporate intelligence firm.
Thursday’s planned release of the full Mueller report by the Justice Department could shed new light on Steele’s role, and the veracity of the controversial dossier he assembled in 2016, featuring explosive—and in some cases sexually lurid—charges of Kremlin influence over Trump and his associates.
Looks like they are going after Steele...has anything in the Steele dossier been proven wrong?
Insurance policy backfire
Let em go after everyone - it is a farce -
it carries the same weight that OJ's words - when he said he was going to
"catch the killers"
Just a ing joke. Idiots will fall for it though - like Qhris and TSA -
lol
Lol, spys
Are those like flys?
You're going to have to explain how this insurance policy conspiracy theory works in full.Insurance policy backfire
It makes no sense on its face.
Easy.
We’ll plot against Trump. Wait for him to win the presidency, get inaugurated and I don’t know wait a full month after said inauguration to enact our brilliant plan.
See, easy. All we had to do was wait well after the elections.
Give us a real actual well reasoned explanation for the term insurance policy rather than this farcical eunuch talk.
Sorry derp, you haven't done this yet.
So, you don't have a good excuse for the use of the term insurance policy.
*spies
"insurance policy":
The text message that Strzok and Page sought to explain was sent on Aug. 15, 2016, around two weeks after the FBI opened “Crossfire Hurricane,” the counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign.
As usual Resistance Reck is full of misinformation.
No excuse.So, you don't have a good excuse for the use of the term insurance policy.
I'll tell you just as soon as you explain the insurance policy conspiracy theory in full, derp.
You have failed so far.
Cool. You admit to the collusion / treason.
lol no
It simply didn't mean what you think it means.
No excuse needed.
You're going to have to explain how this insurance policy conspiracy theory works in full.
It makes no sense on its face.
Muh conditions on explaining the insurance policy term
OK, you can't explain it.
No one would ever expect you could.
I asked first.
No takers.
Therefore the "insurance policy" bull it just that -- bull .
OK, you can't explain it.
No one would ever expect you could.
I asked first.
No takers.
Therefore the "insurance policy" bull it just that -- bull .At watching you talk yourself into that.
So, tell us uninformed what insurance policy means.
No need if you can't tell us what the insurance policy conspiracy theory is.
So, tell us uninformed what insurance policy means.
It's your claim.
Step up.
If you think that's an easier conspiracy to prove than the alleged one that allegedly went down in flames with the release of this report, you've been drinking the same kool aid as the people you're making fun of.
No excuses needed.
If there is no insurance policy conspiracy there is no need to explain the term.
The conspiracy is your claim.
Explain it.
but who knows, you might get BEAUCOUP DEROGATORY INFORMATION that way, get ready for the lit crit, this time and the next!
You can't give a good answer to the insurance policy term. Noted.
Sure I can, there's simply no reason to since you can't even give a good answer to it's use in a conspiracy theory you can't even bother to make up.You can't give a good answer to the insurance policy term. Noted.
I called. You folded.
lol derp
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
