Reply With Quote
Mueller thinks Trump's public actions can be considered obstruction...then punted to congress to do something about it.TSA
Wittes good now?Got around to reading it and thanks for posting very informative
Mueller thinks Trump's public actions can be considered obstruction...then punted to congress to do something about it.
Sen. Richard Burr leaked major Trump-linked 'targets' of FBI's Russia probe to Trump's White House
Only months after Trump's inauguration,
used his position as Gang of Eight member
to inform the Trump White House of just
which members of Trump's own inner circle were the identified "targets" of the FBI’s Russia investigation—
just as that criminal and counterintelligence investigation was getting off the ground.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1851285
They just brought out Clappers dead body to give his "unbiased" 2 cents
why is no one from the left happy that Mueller concluded Trump did not collide with Russia?
Male reporter Richard Maddows show on msnbc tonight is gonna be must see
I think he’ll actually cry tonightMale reporter Richard Maddows show on msnbc tonight is gonna be must see
I think you're doing a decent job of it right now, TSA.
You spend 12 hours a day on this stuff and you still think Mueller "concluded Trump did not collude with Russia."
Like, you're not even right about the Cliff's Notes level stuff. What is wrong with you?
L'chaimGot around to reading it and thanks for posting very informative
Which pages on the Mueller describe evidence of Trump collusion with Russia? Thanks
“The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
Finding no evidence is not the same as concluding the thing didn't happen.
Cliff's Notes.
You: "Mueller concluded Trump did not collide with Russia"
Mueller: We didn't look at collusion.
In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals cons uted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.
I'm still trying to figure out why he tried to fire Mueller if there was nothing to it.
What evidence did Mueller find? He presented zero of it in any indictment.
I literally said "finding no evidence" in the post you quoted.
Your panic over Dear Leader is making you even dumber than usual.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions