That’s ALOT of ongoing matters there
Don’t be disingenuous, no one on his campaign knew they were Russian. I’m sure you’re just as upset about the anti-Trump rallies they set up too.
Mueller's report looks bad for Obama
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/19/opi...www.cnn.com%2F
Is what I said true or false?
Allegations are not facts
Depends on if you thought they knew Russians set them up, did you? And were just as upset about the anti-Trump rallies?
Depends on if you thought they knew Russians set them up, did you? And were just as upset about the anti-Trump rallies?
What the are you talking about? Are you saying the report is incorrect?
CNN losing to Kenan & Kel...
¨Quite more interested¨
The report says some accounts from Russia might have planned rallies. It assumes they were Russian government. That's an allegation not a fact
The report says some accounts from Russia might have planned rallies. It assumes they were Russian government. That's an allegation not a fact
The trump campaign supported rallies, those rallies were organised by russians to take place on US soil. Therefore the trump campaign supported rallies organised by russians to take place on US soil. There is no "depends" there is no "intent" only truth, The truth is that the trump campaign supported rallies organised by russians on US soil. Do you say that is an incorrect statement?
First off, fantastic double post, welcome to the internet.
Secondly, I see the issue is your reading comprehension, so read what I said again, then get back to it.
TSA has been arguing against a black and white report that has been out now for a full day.
And he is still saying no you're wrong.Read the you lazy .
Did you read the full 438 pages?
Yeah. It’s hilarious.
No need to read the report as all of it has been already reported over last year through `leaks'
The report itself has not brought any new facts to the equation. It's a pretty crap job and no need to read 400 pages of crap
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)