Reply With Quote
Can we get Prince as well in that trade? It's not like they are actually using him.
yes, please
Can we get Prince as well in that trade? It's not like they are actually using him.
Boy I miss bald Pattyif it was this Patty then maybe.
Wait, did he actually say this at one point?
https://www.expressnews.com/sports/c...0-12315982.phpPatty Mills is richer now than he’s ever been. Four months ago he agreed to the financial deal of a lifetime, and he believes he deserved it.
“I was rewarded for the years before,” Mills said. “This is a fresh start. There’s no pressure to perform.”
Thats option A
Option B & C: Knicks are rumored to be exploring trading #3 pick to Atlanta for #8 #10.
A: Derozan, 19, 29 to Atlanta for #8, #10 (Rui, Little)
or if 3 way deal
B: Trade Derozan to Atlanta for #3 pick (Hunter)
C: Trade Derozan to Knicks for #8, #10 (Rui, Little)
Lol PATFO would never
Spurs would essentially be getting 3 first round draft picks in the Top 10 for Kawhi & Green in the long run (#8, #10, #9 Poetl). Would make me feel a lot better about what transpired
yeah, this isn't football. It's a superstar driven league and having a bunch of second tier players means a ceiling of first round exit.
Jesus how did I miss that. I don't know whether to laugh or rage about it. It explains a lot though smh.
Since everyone wants to get rid of Patty and Suns want to get rid of Jackson and want a PG. What about mills for jackson and their 32nd pick. this would give them a vet to tutor the young PG and get rid of a player they want to. It gets rid of a player we want to get rid of a fills a need (if he pans out). Biggest problem would be convincing Pop of this.
jackson's a headcase...we don't need him
. ATL laughs and hangs up on the original trade. There’s no way you’re getting that, let alone another player.
Not bad actually. That Warren deal goes one more year than Patty’s deal, so the Suns save 12M. Monty Williams might also see some value is bringing in some stable Spurs guys.
The Lakers 4th pick is going to New Orleans AD.
Who is assumed to be the sixth pick?
I've been a fan of Jackson's for a while. I'd certainly want him if it doesn't cost a pick. That takes care of the sneaky small-wing hole the team might try to fill with Langford, Porter or Johnson. Then they can either use 29 on a center or more comfortably trade 19 and 29 to move up for that PF. Having 32 in the back pocket would make it even better. Don't think Phoenix will go for it, though. I think they may well trade Jackson for a matching expiring like Bertans or even Beli, but they aren't paying to dump him, especially not for a worse contract.
Weird trade; why would a rebuilding team want a 30 year floor raising player and give up 2 top 10 pick's for the privilege? 19 and 29 does nothing for them, they could just stay bad, use those two picks and be in the lottery again next season.
Seems fairly clear that New Orleans doesn't want to ship him there, if they end up doing so then it would probably be at the trade deadline.
do it RC
What????
Money considerations aside, you basically value Jackson more than Murray+Mills? Have you ever watched a Suns game?
Totally agree. As much as I'd like DDR traded, there is no way this year's 6th pick will ever be as good as DDR. At least in the short term (2yrs).
And anyway we have already too many young guys and too little minutes to spread.
Say #19 is worth nothing (not true), that scenario values White as a #6 pick or less. And give zero value to White's development.
Doesn't make any sense at all.
Exactly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
