Was it wild? Were they raping kids?
@ "shocking comment"... it's exactly the same red team was saying when Obama was playing world police... smh
• Insider: Google "is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again."
• Google Exec Says Don't Break Us Up: "smaller companies don't have the resources" to "prevent next Trump situation"
• Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren "misguided" on "breaking up Google"
• Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As "Right-Wing"
• LEAKED Do ents Highlight "Machine Learning Fairness" and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results "fair and equitable"
• Do ents Appear to Show "Editorial" Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
• Insider: Google Violates "letter of the law" and "spirit of the law" on Section 230
GOOGLE INSIDER: "They’re not an objective source of information. They are a highly biased political machine that is bent on never letting somebody like realDonaldTrump come to power again."
"Veritas"
What do you want the government to do about Google, Qhris?
"Hmm real election meddling. Corporations influencing elections. Yep, we have crossed over into fascism.
Google must be stopped. Our existence as a free nation depends on it."
I concur.
What do you want the government to do about Google, Qhris?
Qhris afraid to discuss Google, changes subject to his thoughts that women are icky.
It's an indictment on the state of the college system that they want to acknowledge it's lowered value in this manner, tbh.
For that matter, they're the proof in the pudding, goofy faces and smiles as opposed to any sort of solid argumentation.
Also the little fortnite dancing, surprised they didn't finish with a dab. Disgusting.
What do you think of the Hawley bill?
https://www.hawley.senate.gov/senato...tech-companies
Explain it in your own words, Qhris.
Also, what do you want the government to do about Google?
Hawley who?
Looks like there's potential for collusion and corruption with the FTC (loopholes) Just end all federal protection for BTCs and let them compete like the rest of us on the free market.
Britain was solidly socialist under Churchill's last term.
is running on tax cuts bribery then?
Sen. Josh Hawley, MO (R)
You mean, give a big wet kiss to to liberal trial lawyers who want to make your favorite online sources responsible for what alt-lite edgelords like you post there?
Lol. It's hilarious you can't see the drawbacks -- to all political viewpoints, and indeed, to the general diffusion of information and opinion -- that revoking Section 230 immunity might have.
I agree that Hawley's scheme of having political appointees oversee the political neutrality of big tech companies is rich with opportunities for abuse, but blowing up Section 230 and letting trial lawyers determine who and what we can read online ain't the answer either.
No that's called policy.
so why isn't running loan forgiveness called policy? because the libs do it?
Background on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act:
https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230
You should read what Nietzsche has to say abouy democracy. Or perhaps you already have.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)