Reply With Quote
Typical chicken non answer.
You actually did infer there’s a conspiracy at play supposedly coming from the highest ranks of the DOJ. That’s a conspiracy theory.
I’m not privy to the details of the agreement. If a prosecutor thinks it has enough evidence to pursue a case against it, then I’ll check out the indictment before forming an opinion.
Typical chicken non answer.
You know what evidence they had against Epstein and you know the deal he got. Knowing those things do you think the NOA was above board? yes or no.
“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffre...in-plain-sight
The Herald learned that, as part of the plea deal, Epstein provided what the government called “valuable consideration” for unspecified information he supplied to federal investigators. While the do ents obtained by the Herald don’t detail what the information was, Epstein’s sex crime case happened just as the country’s subprime mortgage market collapsed, ushering in the 2008 global financial crisis.
Records show that Epstein was a key federal witness in the criminal prosecution of two prominent executives with Bear Stearns, the global investment brokerage that failed in 2008, who were accused of corporate securities fraud. Epstein was one of the largest investors in the hedge fund managed by the executives, who were later acquitted. It is not known what role, if any, the case played in Epstein’s plea negotiations.
Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...#storylink=cpy
Would love to see Mueller asked next week about Epstein being an intelligence asset under Mueller’s FBI
You talking to me?
I don’t know what evidence they had against him, and I don’t know the details of the deal. Honest. As a matter of fact, I’ve never even heard of Epstein until some of you guys mentioned him here.
As far as your question, and based on the above, I have no idea. I’ve heard it was allegedly a ‘sweet deal’. Many rich and well connected get those... that’s as far as I know.
Now, if a prosecutor feels the law was broken and they can prove it, they should absolutely prosecute.
Here’s my question now, since you seem reluctant to admit it: are you peddling a conspiracy theory here?
Nope. Just presenting facts and asking questions.
I don’t know what evidence they had against him, and I don’t know the details of the deal. Honest. As a matter of fact, I’ve never even heard of Epstein until some of you guys mentioned him here.
As far as your question, and based on the above, I have no idea. I’ve heard it was allegedly a ‘sweet deal’. Many rich and well connected get those... that’s as far as I know.
Now, if a prosecutor feels the law was broken and they can prove it, they should absolutely prosecute.
Here’s my question now, since you seem reluctant to admit it: are you peddling a conspiracy theory here?
I want to know who above Acosta was calling the shots telling him to back off and why.
Could have been any number of VIPs who ed girls with Epstein.
They say ignorance is bliss.
He's not privy to the details
When we need a cookie cut answer or what Ryan Saavedra thinks, we’ll let you know.
And you think random tweets hold the answer to that or a court of law?
Tweets are largely opinion, not facts.
lolBusiness Insider reported on President Donald Trump discussing Jeffrey Epstein after his arrest: "Well I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him," Trump said. "He was a fixture of Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago, I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan."
There's as much evidence for that as the surmise Epstein was an asset of a foreign intelligence service. None, really.
The Bear Stearns connection is weird: that's where Epstein started out in business.
Vicky Ward reported on that too, about 15 years ago: no one yet has been able to figure out how Epstein made his nut.
The tweets I posted were emails showing main Justice's involvement, along with one of Epstein's lawyers saying approval came from main Justice. Emails and statement from Dershowitz opinion or fact?
I really enjoyed the no comment on the below quotes
“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffre...in-plain-sight
The Herald learned that, as part of the plea deal, Epstein provided what the government called “valuable consideration” for unspecified information he supplied to federal investigators. While the do ents obtained by the Herald don’t detail what the information was, Epstein’s sex crime case happened just as the country’s subprime mortgage market collapsed, ushering in the 2008 global financial crisis.
Records show that Epstein was a key federal witness in the criminal prosecution of two prominent executives with Bear Stearns, the global investment brokerage that failed in 2008, who were accused of corporate securities fraud. Epstein was one of the largest investors in the hedge fund managed by the executives, who were later acquitted. It is not known what role, if any, the case played in Epstein’s plea negotiations.
Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...#storylink=cpy
Vicky Ward says her editors at Vanity fair and the NYT ed many of the details now coming out. She tjinks they had been gotten to.
I can see why TSA is apparently aroused by the pedo/blackmail conspiracy, it backhandedly validates his intuition about Pizzagate -- vile corruption in high places.
Not sure why anyone would want to hold a shield for anyone involved, but there you have it, red team will defend their own and act like Epstein's grift was a blue team special.
Like I said before, throw anyone who ed kids or enabled them to keep doing so in the wood chipper. Sure, throw Dersh, Cosby and Clinton in first if they did it. Alex Acosta trading his professional honor for access to money and power is eminently worthy of that treatment, toi.
“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffre...in-plain-sight
The Herald learned that, as part of the plea deal, Epstein provided what the government called “valuable consideration” for unspecified information he supplied to federal investigators.
Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...#storylink=cpy
"None, really"
Welcome to yesterday
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions