So you're afraid to answer.
Cool.
Post only about me from now on.
Cos X posts, Y hours, Z pretend w's. Par.
So you're afraid to answer.
Cool.
Post only about me from now on.
Says the guy who very pointedly is trying to make it about me.
Compulsive psychopav
No, I was discussing the picture I posted.
I can understand your fear of putting those names together since your OP is guilt by association innuendo.
You will never name the two men in that picture.
lol derp
Cool. Discuss it. Make a point if you have one.
I can understand your fear of putting those names together since your OP is guilt by association innuendo.
You will never name the two men in that picture.
Prove me right.
Nope. Not making a guilt by association argument whatsoever.
Oh, what is your argument, derp?
Spell it out.
More along the lines of my continued arguments on the Clintons; they're thick as thieves with some bad hombres.
(See, that's how you make a point. Note that I didn't have to ask a meaningless question over and over).
As demonstrated here, so is Trump.
lol derp
Because Trump told him a Buffalo Bill cheerleader is hot at a party.
Laughingstock Chump
Epstein had his number too, derp. Trump was at his home too, derp.
And that makes them guilty of something?
Explain.
21 of them? How many flights did Trump take to pedo island? For that matter, how many flights did Clinton take to pedo island?
I don't understand the way of the world; I'm a child
In all likelihood.
Blake Zero
Don't know. People had lots of numbers back then.
Yes, derp -- I was just about to ask you that very question.How many flights did Trump take to pedo island? For that matter, how many flights did Clinton take to pedo island?
How many flights did Clinton take to Epstein's private island?
Give a number and a link to your evidence.
So guilt by association.
Just like Trump is obviously guilty of something since he would hang out with that bad hombre.
According to you.
lol derp
No. Likelihood of "guilt" (bad doings) based upon indicator(s).
Chump pretending to not understand nuance.
Par.
The indicator being association with bad hombres.
lol derp
Well, when you find out it's ballpark 21, let us know. We won't expect the return call on that one.
Too bad I asked first. Cards on the table, bruh.
Not my job.
The guilt by association is clear.
That's what your thread is about, so I just proved it with Trump.
Bad billionaires don't get into trouble together
Dip .
According to the flight logs, zero.
Your turn.
How many flights did Clinton take to Epstein's private island?
Give a number and a link to your evidence.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)