So, you think you could've solved slavery? Tell us about that.
you think it's a fair deal to just go with votes and not the EC? you ever been to a small city/state then you know their voices are mute compared to a big city/state. it's the reason when you get to a certain 700k in people you get another rep.
either way, 200+ yrs of the EC and now all of a sudden with HRC's loss yall lefty's want to change the rules. nobody could've seen that coming...![]()
So, you think you could've solved slavery? Tell us about that.
Show me where I personally made that claim anywhere.
Right now.
You've been called out again.
it's the fact that these losers can't discern the past from the present. between the time of our forefathers and now there's been plenty of changes but these losers expected all these changes to happen back in 1776 or earlier. it's absurd and lunacy at its best.
i mean if we're ing about slavery now then why aren't we ing about slavery in our present day instead of ing about the past? i never see these same losers bringing up present day slave trades but i guess they can't virtue signal if it's not against AMERICA and its past.
Look, they failed to "solve" slavery. Period. They weren't perfect so stop sucking their s.
And present day slave traders are bad since somehow that's not understood for dumbasses like you.
i never said they were perfect so why keep being disingenuous by putting words in my mouth?
of course present day slave traders are bad but i never see yall lefty's virtue signaling for the downtrodden who are sold to other men world wide. instead, yall play pretend in the past as if that's present day AMERICA. it's sick.
you live in the past pav and that's exactly what your commie heroes want of you and the rest of the masses of idiot losers that kowtow to them.![]()
its not even about big state vs small state. its about the clearly blue/red states vs the "battleground" states. somebody voting for president, even from smaller states like iowa, montana, north/south dakota , nebraska, etc have virtually no incentive to vote. they already know their states are going red. but a voter in bigger cities like philadelphia or miami actually can make a big difference. to me, it seems silly to decide that one citizen's vote counts more than another's because one lives in state A and the other lives in state B. you don't agree? i'm talking about the individual voters, kw. you and me. realistically, neither of our presidential votes have any impact. Texas is gong red no matter what you do and CA is going blue no matter what i do (well technically i just moved out of state, but just as an example). but in other states, that's not the case. it doesnt seem equitable
but you dont think each citizen's voice should be equal? i mean, is one guy from ohio really a more important person than 1 guy in texas?
its been inequitable all along, though in a vast majority of cases the winner of the electoral college also happened to win the popular vote, so it hadn't been that big a deal. it's happened twice in the last 5 elections, though. i mean, in 6 of the last 7 elections, more americans have voted for the democrat presidential candidate than the republican candidate, but republicans have won 3 of those elections. the scales are tilted tbh...either way, 200+ yrs of the EC and now all of a sudden with HRC's loss yall lefty's want to change the rules. nobody could've seen that coming...![]()
did you even notice derp's trying to do the same to me?
Your dumb ass chimed in right after that, so call him out about it.
Dip .
Present![]()
I never have once seen you talk about modern day slave traders.
ing commie.
![]()
derp, I called YOU out.
You lied.
So, you want your cake and to eat it, too.
Par.
Were they bad men to allow slavery to continue?
Show me that lie, psychopav.
DUMB ASS
and why should i? i'm not the one virtue signaling the past but not the present.
ps: i see i hit a nerve with ya.![]()
no i didn't notice and didn't need to notice tbh. you mad because you got called out? funny how that works and then you go to the cliche ol' "call him out too!"
Dip .
you back down so quickly and so often I missed this one pacifier.gif
Why should anyone?
Thanks for agreeing with me, dip !![]()
Yea, anybody not in the can for Dems is far right.
Good. That is neither Democrats nor fascim.
The "digital public square."
Why is that funny, Lambert?
Courts already ruled Trump can't block people on Twitter. Just bury your head in the sand though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)