Reply With Quote
Actaully...shooters can see everything better in daylight so I think more lives would've been taken.
you're an idiot racistBlaKKKe with logic too.kw flips the simple logic board and walks away
a what-if about a real incident in which a muslim used a truck. so ing ridiculous i am actually having this bs convo with you and entertaining your flawed logic. this is ridiculous.
What the did you think it was?
Actaully...shooters can see everything better in daylight so I think more lives would've been taken.
you claimed my logic is flawed. i claim yours is as well as your comprehension.
Yes.
The what-if part is where you change the weapon to the one used in Dayton.
Only the weakest of minds wouldn't be able to do that.
Oh the rubber-glue logic. It's legit!
Only if they wear these awesome glasses...which also work well for driving coincidentally...
https://www.trytacglasses.com/?mid=9...CAAEgJ0efD_BwE
Or just have eyes.
No. Not at all Derp.
I am saying that in his scenario where the government does come after him or anyone else his guns wouldn’t stop them. I am not saying the government will come after him.
you flood the forum with replies in order to push your bs into oblivion in order to prop up your flawed logic. it's your lame tactic you use time and time again pav.
this is the dumbest of convo's ever. your what-if for a real life incident that happened is asinine. then you go on and claim this second question posed is your original only to be shown that that's not true. once that happened you backtrack and call me names. you're the idiot in this scenario. sorry not sorry.
Right. The gubmit usually has pretty solid reasoning for "coming after" a person or group. What they use and how they use it can go way over the top tho.
it's called truth. i wasn't taking a jab whatsoever. you tried to take a jab at me but you're the same re pav is obviously.
No. It's the same question.
Are you high right now?
no it's most def not.
"hey this guy you remembered that used a truck to kill people... would you rather him not have a gun?"
"hey this what-if about a terrorist... gun or truck?"
two totally different scenarios. two totally different logical conclusions.
Eyes are also helpful when using a automobile to kill innocent people.
maybe if you ed racistBlaKKKe's wife in front of him yall both would gain some logic points?
Well, as long as we're going with scenarios, if you're the govt. would you prefer that the people that you want to go after be unarmed? Obviously, it's a deterrent; so, your point is ultimately re ed.
unless you're an owl
Cuck lashing out. Par.
are you high right now?
you are literally talking to ST's biggest ever. why are you wasting your time?
Saipov has eyes in both scenarios.
no, but you must be.
Actually that makes the government more likely to kill whomever they are after. They don't just give up.
LOL...i love what this thread degenerated into
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions