30 people shot in Midland Texas| here we go again

[DMC]

It's very important for internet tough guys to say nothing will ever work so they can keep their ability to shoot the government.

^Doesn't offer any suggestions either, just makes a side note.

[Pavlov]

^Doesn't offer any suggestions either, just makes a side note.

What is your suggestion, tough guy?

[DMC]

If folks here are a representation of the liberal party it's no wonder you lost to a reality TV cheese puff.

You have re ed Spurs Homer making zero sense, Pavlov eye rolling and crumb snatching, no one making a single suggestion that would have prevented these shootings except Chucho who's probably conservative.

[DMC]

What is your suggestion, tough guy?

Total ban and confiscation.

[Pavlov]

If folks here are a representation of the liberal party it's no wonder you lost to a reality TV cheese puff.

You have re ed Spurs Homer making zero sense, Pavlov eye rolling and crumb snatching, no one making a single suggestion that would have prevented these shootings except Chucho who's probably conservative.

What's your suggestion, tough guy?

[Pavlov]

Total ban and confiscation.

Are you suggesting your guns should be banned and confiscated?

[DMC]

Are you suggesting your guns should be banned and confiscated?

Yes since people won't arm themselves which is the other alternative and even then it's 50/50. It would reduce the amount of mass shootings but probably not the number of killings overall. You'd have to repeal the 2nd, then offer a buyback and amnesty period before going house to house with a search team.

[Chucho]

"Just stop letting whitey buy guns and let's not talk about the coloreds killing themselves."


Pretty much sums up one side's rhetoric, but wont directly say it.

[Pavlov]

Yes since people won't arm themselves which is the other alternative and even then it's 50/50. It would reduce the amount of mass shootings but probably not the number of killings overall. You'd have to repeal the 2nd, then offer a buyback and amnesty period before going house to house with a search team.

So you'll voluntarily give up all your guns if your suggestion happens?

[DMC]

So you'll voluntarily give up all your guns if your suggestion happens?

I'd sell them back first, and if that wasn't offered I'd glady turn my guns over to a team of inspectors who would likely thank me as a caring citizen. Why not?

[Thread]

"Just stop letting whitey buy guns and let's not talk about the coloreds killing themselves."


Pretty much sums up one side's rhetoric, but wont directly say it.

Tell it, Cooch. Testify!!!

[Thread]

Yes since people won't arm themselves which is the other alternative and even then it's 50/50. It would reduce the amount of mass shootings but probably not the number of killings overall. You'd have to repeal the 2nd, then offer a buyback and amnesty period before going house to house with a search team.

Ha! The apple cart can still be righted & restocked even after Trump. You perform the above we'll never get back to TOSB timesPERIOD

[Pavlov]

I'd sell them back first, and if that wasn't offered I'd glady turn my guns over to a team of inspectors who would likely thank me as a caring citizen. Why not?

OK. Great.


I'll mark you both down as favoring a complete ban and confiscation.

[DMC]

Ha! The apple cart can still be righted & restocked even after Trump. You perform the above we'll never get back to TOSB timesPERIOD

Liberals will never propose such a thing, not the ones who have a shot at winning their party's support. They'll suggest placebo laws like magazine capacity and evil features and "assault weapon" legislation. Round and round it will go. More people will die, more guns will be sold, more people will die, more guns will be sold, liberals will never have the courage of their own convictions. It would be their death knell to do so. They know it but they'll pretend they have answers.

[DMC]

OK. Great.


I'll mark you both down as favoring a complete ban and confiscation.

Make sure you add "at gunpoint if necessary - including the use of lethal force to ensure compliance"

Is this all you have? Where's your suggestion?

[Pavlov]

Make sure you add "at gunpoint if necessary - including the use of lethal force to ensure compliance"

Sure.

Sounds good.

That's what you want.

[DMC]

Sure.

Sounds good.

That's what you want.

So what's your suggestion to prevent mass shootings?

[Pavlov]

So what's your suggestion to prevent mass shootings?

Maybe better communication could've stopped the Odessa shooting since the dude called both the local police and the FBI the day of the shooting.

Seems easier than confiscating your guns at gunpoint, but that's what you want.

[spurraider21]

Are you suggesting your guns should be banned and confiscated?

Yes since people won't arm themselves which is the other alternative and even then it's 50/50. It would reduce the amount of mass shootings but probably not the number of killings overall. You'd have to repeal the 2nd, then offer a buyback and amnesty period before going house to house with a search team.

so you're a proponent of repealing 2A?

[DMC]

Maybe better communication could've stopped the Odessa shooting since the dude called both the local police and the FBI the day of the shooting.

Seems easier than confiscating your guns at gunpoint, but that's what you want.

Saying "better" doesn't explain how you'd facilitate that. If he called both, who needs to communicate better, the shooter, the FBI, the police? How would do you propose they alter their approach/policy to catch these things?

[DMC]

so you're a proponent of repealing 2A?

Are you here to discuss it or just snatch a crumb or two?

quid pro quo

I think it should be proposed. I'd like to see how the court responds to it. Could the 3 party system be a deterrent to the kind of change we really need?

You?

[Pavlov]

Saying "better" doesn't explain how you'd facilitate that. If he called both, who needs to communicate better, the shooter, the FBI, the police? How would do you propose they alter their approach/policy to catch these things?

oh, moving the goalpost now.

lol DMConfiscate

It's not my fault you lack the imagination to think better communication may have helped in Odessa.

Not my job than nthink for you.

[DMC]

oh, moving the goalpost now.

lol DMConfiscate

It's not my fault you lack the imagination to think better communication may have helped in Odessa.

Not my job than nthink for you.

I could imagine without you telling me "better communication".

Quantify it. How would you know you have better communication?

When called out you always resort to your shtick. You're a fraud

[Chucho]

I could imagine without you telling me "better communication".

Quantify it. How would you know you have better communication?

When called out you always resort to your shtick. You're a fraud

You asked him how he'd prevent mass shootings, he gave a broad, half-assed non answer to two instances but YOU moved the goalposts. Makes sense.

[spurraider21]

Are you here to discuss it or just snatch a crumb or two?

quid pro quo

I think it should be proposed. I'd like to see how the court responds to it. Could the 3 party system be a deterrent to the kind of change we really need?

You?

i'm always here to discuss. glad to see you are as well, for a change.

court response wouldn't really be part of the equation, though, with respect to a cons utional amendment. courts get involved when a law violates the cons ution (ie if congress passed a confiscation law tomorrow, without first amending the cons ution). if you amend the cons ution to no longer protect gun ownership, then courts would have no say with respect to confiscation.

so are you a proponent of repealing 2A?