Took ing long enough
criminal traitor has been impeachable since 1/20/17
Took ing long enough
criminal traitor has been impeachable since 1/20/17
This thread will be a fun one to watch unfold
I predict it will end with
Nothing will happen. Trill will start 20 more threads that have already been discussed and avoid posting in them besides the OP. , there is a 15 page Donald Trump impeachment thread already.
Mueller handed Pelosi hard evidence of Trash's multiple obstruction acts. Pelosi. She needs to retire.
Won't get 1 Republican vote in the senate. Waste of time.
Now we'll see what Dems put into their Articles of Impeachment
Impeach Trump. But don’t necessarily try him in the Senate.
But to think of the House of Representatives as akin to a prosecutor or grand jury is misguided.
The Cons ution’s design suggests a quite different allocation of functions:
The Senate, unlike any pe (or trial) jury, is legally free to engage in politics in arriving at its verdict.
And the House, unlike any grand jury, can conduct an impeachment inquiry that
ends with a verdict and
not just a referral to the Senate for trial —
an inquiry in which the target is afforded an opportunity to participate and mount a full defense.
It seems fair to surmise, then, that an impeachment inquiry conducted with ample opportunity for the accused to defend himself before a vote by the full House
would be at least substantially protected, even if not entirely bullet-proofed, against a Senate whitewash.
The House, assuming an impeachment inquiry leads to a conclusion of Trump’s guilt, could choose between
presenting articles of impeachment even to a Senate pre-committed to burying them and dispensing with impeachment as such
while embodying its conclusions of criminality or other grave wrongdoing
in a condemnatory “Sense of the House” resolution
far stronger than a mere censure.
the idea would be to build into the very design of this particular inquiry
an offramp that would make bypassing the Senate an option
while also nourishing the hope that a public fully educated about what this president did
would make even a Senate beholden to this president and manifestly lacking in political courage willing to bite the bullet and remove him.
By resolving now to pursue such a path ..., the House would be doing the right thing as a cons utional matter.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/impeach-trump-but-dont-necessarily-try-him-in-the-senate/2019/06/05/22d83672-87bc-11e9-a870-b9c411dc4312_story.html
The Dems could also CENSURE Barr for his lying 4-pager, and
separate censures for any other that Trash and Barr have committed.
But Pelose and other senior Dems won't do .
My guess is that a few House Repugs retiring as fed up with Trash and knowing the House will be Dem after 2020, will also vote to convict Trash since he could not punish them.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-24-2019 at 01:18 PM.
muh Russia
helsinki alone would have gotten obama publicly lynched from the white house lawn
someday history will show - and no one will believe or understand why the american people witnessed -with their own eyes and ears-
an american president stand in front of the world and respond to a reporters direct question that he in fact
believes and supports russias side
over his own usa intelligence who unanimously concluded that russia attacked the usa
in front of the world he sided with our arch enemy
and americans did nothing about this betrayal
What exactly are we watching for?
Which conversation?
There were eight.
Do you, Darrin, see anything at all potentially wrong with what Trump said he did RE: withholding aid to Ukraine?
Yes or no.
He won't answer that (truthfully anyway)
Let's do this!
this show is gonna end the same way 2016 election night ended
With snowflakes, manginas and shillary s crying their eyes off
This will be beautiful to watch
Will make the Kavanaughty asskicking like a walk in the park
We're divided due to the Orange menace in the WH. Her saying that is a paid advertisement for David Dennison
You're playing checkers. The Republicans that don't do nothing will be on record. This will be used against them. Remember, many of them are up for re-election in 2020.
The only reason why David is a free man is because the Republican Senators are protecting him. What do you think will happen when the Senate turns Blue in 2020?
Lmao he'll be out of office of the Dems get the senate. If I'm playing checkers you're playing peekaboo or whatever it is toddlers are playing these days
There is no law that says a President can't be indicted, but Barr is acting as if it is law to protect him.
He absolutely can and will be indicted when he is out of office and he knows it.
That's why he sent Rudy to Ukraine. He's desperate to do whatever he can to stay in office. He's pathetic tbh
Here's a good read for when you're taking a
Nope one
And he supposedly asked 8 times according to someone that heard someone say that
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)