keep posting only about me, derp
Pick a side DMC.
It's gonna hurt.
keep posting only about me, derp
he's gonna say something edgy about you now.
insanity defense tbh
His edgy comments have been lame of late. For awhile, actualy.
There's something to the old saw that premature cynics, for lack of idealistic brio, get senile prematurely..
So you get a DMC who's a stodgy acolyte.of police power.
While pretending to be a free thinking libertarian.
Didn't Botham Jean have the right to resist a wrongful home inavsion?
If not, why not?
Why does the castle doctrine protect the invader but not the legal resident?
Oh right, he was black with Caribbean heritage. Not from here.
that church singer!
A cop got confused and scared; he deserved to die!
Yeah I think it is murder. Would like to see her do a few years plus probation. Hopefully she doesn't walk.
Sure. She's still en led to a defense.
Who cares besides friends and kin, it's just a man's life sacrificed to the emotional frailty of LE.
God forbid a civil servant should be momentarily inconvenienced, better to extinguish the complaint altogether.
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-01-2019 at 01:59 AM.
Probably what the judge was thinking amirite?
2 in the morning. Whinehole drunk and angry lol.
Not contested.
She's getting one. Bully on her lawyers. Protecting the guilty from legal responsibility is a primary obligation of defense.
what are you doing up at this hour?
Your hypothesis, not mine. I was thinking of the defense.
Was Botham Jean en led to resist a cop who had no good reason to invade his home?
Legal will be all that matters in a court of law? No way!
"Benefit of doubt" of what? That in the dark she thought his ice cream spoon was really a knife?
Good to know you're okay with her walking free. All hail the Justice system. It's infallible. Don't fight it.
yep, that's what I pointed out as an exception, mental illness
Honestly, her defense makes sense in a civil case (which I'm sure there will be one), not a criminal trial. Murder cases like this one, where the murderer confessed and there's no mental illness or some such going on, end up being a cursory trial to prove the forensics indicate that indeed she pulled the trigger, etc. Which is pretty damn clear in this case.
The jury itself doesn't define the sentence, which is where there's wiggle room to take into consideration her reasoning can come into play.
Well, I can't say I'm surprised DMC would champion the feelings-based defense when it's a black man who got murdered.
I wouldn't take DMC as somebody that's racist. And the confusion between criminal vs civil is pretty common, tbh
I just wasn't surprised tbh.
Mostly about the feelings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)