Reply With Quote
The aid went out as soon as the WH found out about the whistleblower. The timing indicates guilty mindedness, tbh.
Which national security experts is he undermining?
The aid went out as soon as the WH found out about the whistleblower. The timing indicates guilty mindedness, tbh.
I mean these geniuses wrapped up an impeachment case with four or five bows for the Democrats. They had to dig to get to Nixon's impeachable acts but Dennison just copped to it immediately. It is amazing just how stupid they are.
But Darrin loves his Dennison and will defend him to the death.
Sleepy Joe is a very weak candidate. He's been taken down numerous times by his own behavior. No foreign interference necessary.
Trump's Ukraine expertt thought the call endangered US national security and Ukraine's as well, as it might tend to undermine Dem support for military aid.. He also thought it might damage US relations with Ukraine.
Corruption in the highest office is a per se national security risk, wouldn't you say?
Which makes Dennison's actions even stupider if that's even possible.
None of this helps your argument. Dude did it and admitted it.
Which one was that?
Exactly.
Who cares why this was even started.
Do you actually read the news or just spew talking points you're given on Facebook?
The Ltc. listening in on the call, Trump's Ukraine expert. Have you been reading through the thread? You seem to have missed a few essential details.
Tomorrow’s witness who is going to testify looks to be another really bad one for Trump.
Just give me a name.
This was exactly what many thought about Nixon trying to undo McGovern’s campaign by breaking into some DNC offices.
Takes a paranoid SOB.
So you can see if any talking points have been made up for him?
Jesus Christ dude, you can't find the guy who testified today on your own?
Vindman.
Why are you being purposefully obtuse?
This is insane. He admits he has no idea what is being discussed but he's sure Dennison has done nothing wrong and never will or even could in any situation.
Alexander S Vindman
https://apps.npr.org/do ents/do ...tatement-Final
If only a news publication like the NYT wrote a story giving the guys name and testimony.
To be fair, he only watches Tucker and Tucker was talking about how the blacks are going to kill him.
But getting blown by not-wife is impeachable.
Sorry, I don't always keep up with all the latest resistance impeachment porn.
POTUS seems to think it is.
Not why he was impeached
Not even when commenting throughout the thread. The answer wasn't hidden from you, you just ignored it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions