what did I have to say about Russia?
You have no ing clue what I posted.
Sorry Qhris, all the testimony and Dennison's "transcript" have proved the whistleblower right. Since we have the testimony of people who were actually involved now, what would be the point of having the whistleblower testify?
Explain.
what did I have to say about Russia?
You have no ing clue what I posted.
Chris, the Lord ourGod, wants to smite the whistleblower.
Let us pray
you can sit here and make claims that i'm far-right when i'm not even close to that bull moniker you're trying to label me with but how dare i assume you're a russiagate peddler... what exactly have you said against the conspiracy theory called russiagate? your silence, if any, speaks volumes!
don't act like you're not just like the rest of the losers here who want to usher in socialistic ideals, communistic ideals, or just plain out far-left bull . you libs aren't libs at all and that's why yall are called progressives... progressively moving into a stalinesque utopia.
This exactly what you have so wrong.
Dont post about what I have said when you dont have a fckn clue.
I made many posts about what I thought about Trump colluding with Russia v. Russian interfering with our elections.
You should really stop posting and shut your mouth because you are completely wrong.
Which is not surprising.
And I am supposed to act like I am one of the many lefty losers here?
You are seriously establishing criteria dealing with what a loser is?
You should really stop posting.
Bernie Sanders Attacks Bill Gates’ Wealth. Gates Employs Over 100,000 People. Sanders Does Other Things.
Nikki Haley: ‘There’s Just Nothing Impeachable’ About Trump’s Actions
Surprised Nunes has time for this, considering he's busy suing twitter users...
TSA is falling for it again.
lol dumbass
I think I'll post more now...
George Nader says hi.
i never thought there would be people like Qhris who think child porn is acceptable depending on the political party involved.
I see everyone up in arms because they don’t like the guy and this won’t matter in the long run anyway. ALL politicians are crooks....this changes nothing.
Senate Democrats Face Their Own Risks Over Impeachment
The New York TimesNovember 9, 2019, 8:06 AM MST
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-de...150627442.html
K
But remember, everyone follows you.
Especially when you want honest answers to questions.
Trump wants to win even more rural votes in 2020. Democrats are scrambling to catch up
Read more here: https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/pol...#storylink=cpy
How would you defend this...
boiled down - this is what they have to defend:
Extortion = no defense aid/$$$ - unless you smear bidens AND clear Putin
Bribery = IF you help me win 2020 Election - Ill help you defend your country against Russia
and
they have trumps confession and multiple corroborating credible patriot witnesses ....
with a cover- up as the proverbial “cherry on top”
how will they defend that?
In May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe. In the letter, they implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake. Describing themselves as “strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,” the Democratic senators declared, “We have supported [the] capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these [democratic] principles to avoid the ire of President Trump,” before demanding Lutsenko “reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation.” So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)