Reply With Quote
You mean other than ducks and Wild Cobra? Zero...
You mean other than ducks and Wild Cobra? Zero...
It's already out there. Have you gone to Chicago to demand to see it yet? It's really that important to you, isn't it?
truth be told, I believe Whottt made that mccain landslide prediction before the economic meltdown. McCain was up before the AIG, Lehman & Merrill news.
He's still predicting a landslide, but he pre-excused the loss he sees coming with a charge of Massive Vote Fraud.
I don't know when he first came up with it, but he made FURTHER outlandish predictions after the event without a doubt.
In anycase, a McCain landslide was NEVER going to happen.
I stilll think it's going to be a McCain landslide, with no qualifiers. Let me be clear on this.
I wasn't basing my opinion on the way McCain was polling at that time.
Funny how these things work...I made this thread to point out it's a mistake for Obama to not just show his birth certificate...I said it was going to become a bigger and bigger issue unless he just gets over with...
I was called stupid, paranoid...all sorts of other , and now it's a case being brought against Obama in multiple states and is being appealed to the Supreme Court...and the same asshats are still telling me how wrong and clueless I am.
And they are questioning my landslide prediction as they are doing it....
I know for a fact Chump and Manny were participants in at least one discussion concerning the inaccuracy of the polls in a past historic election...I drew parallels to this one, and was rebuffed by the both of you..I fully encourage you to go look at the poll that was off in that election...what it did then, what it's doing now.
So far it's a near identical trend...debate or no.
I know for a fact I asked whottt for the number of fraudulent votes cast. He proceeded to lose his and put me on ignore and to fate has never produced any fraudulent votes.
The Hawaii Supreme Court.
EDIT: NM, you meant Berg. Still, you say it as though a case being appealed to the SC gives it any credibility. Did you know I could sue for reparations because my alien race was exterminated by humans in Laredo in the late 1890's, and when I wqas rejected I could appeal to the Supreme Court?
I know for a fact that whottt is talking about the Reagan/Carter election and he cited polls taken before but not after their rather pivotal debate that occurred just about a week before the election. Now, I am completely open to the idea of a game changer for McCain even this late, but whottt is just flat out lying when he says the cir stances are identical.
I don't know exactly why whottt has started blatantly lying with such consistency because he never had to in the past. I can only conclude that he feels his self-perceived e-reputation of being right is at stake (hint: he's often wrong, he just never talks about it), and that is more important than anything.
Berg just had his lawsuit tossed out of court. You're slow to catch up.
I'm sure he'll appeal all the way, but how is this an issue? I mean, if it's not for ducks and WC, I didn't even hear about it.
Of course we're questioning your landslide prediction. I mean, we're questioning your sanity overall. The example you provided was refuted because it doesn't match the actual situation AT ALL.
BTW, did you take your meds today?
oooh there we go.
"no qualifiers" includes not claiming massive vote fraud when McCain loses.
This is the statement that goes in the siggy.
All it takes to appeal a case to the Supreme Court is losing in a lower court. It's not as if the Supreme Court decides every case appealed to it; in fact, only about 5% of all pe ions presented to the Court are granted and reviewed.
There's a case against him in Washington State...
Oh yeah there also cases against him over it in New York, Connecticut, California and Georgia.
PS: And Ohio.
Ya'll are so ing informed...
cases, OK. Repug HARASSMENT cases.
Decisions? Why not? What's the delay?
A "case" or a suit?
I could file the suit I referenced above in any of those states. It doesn't mean I have a case.
I might eb a little better informed on it if it was actually that big a story.
I reserve the right to claim massive voter fraud if there is evidence it was commited...and there already is.
Point is...I don't expect I'll have to.
Whether I have to or not...I'll continue to bring it up, because I don't like massive voter fraud...unlike you, who are totally okay with it as long as it favors your candidate.
Much like you are okay with depictions and threats of violence towards Women and Presidential Candidates...much like all of you are, as long as it's not your candidate.
They can sue him in every state. What difference does it make?
Let me know when one of those suits rules that Obama has to show the certificate in court. In the meantime suits mean pretty much nothing. Just more for the courts to throw out.
What ever.. 8>1
King County judge tosses lawsuit over Obama citizenship.
Ya'll are so ing informed...
Eventually one will...Judges of both parties like to make the front page.
In the meantime suits mean pretty much nothing. Just more for the courts to throw out.
So are you saying the speculation is decreasing and becoming less of a factor?
Because that's what would have to be happening for me to be wrong here...
I reserve the right to call you out for your stupidity.
And show me the money... Where's the evidence of this massive voter fraud???
You should file a lawsuit and bring your evidence. I mean, it's easy to say you don't like it then sit in your ass and do nothing about it.
You mean, it's ok to have depictions and threats of violence towards Obama and Biden?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions