DD, you better look at marriage soon... not many girls want a 55 yr old with low hanging balls.
I think that pressure is always there somewhat though. Dates are like job interviews. Sure, after a few, you might find that the person you're dating isn't someone you need to hire long-term, but you might want to take on as a temporary hire. But personally, when I was dating I always asked myself the "Is she long-term" question after each of the first few dates.
And around the 9th women or so, I realized the answer was yes.
Crofl...i got a long way to go before i'm in tlong's predicamentDD, you better look at marriage soon... not many girls want a 55 yr old with low hanging balls.
I just need a woman that's not in the medical field and will leave me the alone for 20 sundays out of the year.
Don't think I'm disputing the question so much as I am suggesting a different answer. The kind of openness and honesty that I demand requires that both parties frequently ask those types of questions -- where is this going, where do I want it to be going, is this relationship going to be enough, and so on. However, the lack of pressure, as I see it, means that perhaps the realization that he or she isn't long terms doesn't have to be followed up by severing ties.I think that pressure is always there somewhat though. Dates are like job interviews. Sure, after a few, you might find that the person you're dating isn't someone you need to hire long-term, but you might want to take on as a temporary hire. But personally, when I was dating I always asked myself the "Is she long-term" question after each of the first few dates.
And around the 9th women or so, I realized the answer was yes.
Interesting thread.
Question for the guys?
Having read both The Skeptic and Funts very interesting viewpoints, which would you date and consider marriage material and which one would you not?
Not implying either is wrong-just curious what the guys here would choose if given the choice.
neither because they should both be in the kitchen and not on a sports message board tbh
unless CF would accommodate me into a polygamous relationship with her and all her girlfriends. i might ponder on that.
The skeptic has the better personality undoubtedly
op: if you are a young (<35), you should not be worried about a woman's past outside of any marriages or kids. You are probably not settlign down with her anyway.
and theskeptic sounds pretty sexy tbh.. while DuckingFumb is almost assuredly a pre-op male transgender.
I'd rather date tenbucktammy.
You'd rather date one of your trolls...how apropos, mouse.
she turn down your fingerling potato as well?
Not separated by even one sentence.
who, CF? I thought we established my opinion that she is a man (born one, at least). As for theskeptic, no I haven't given her the opportunity to turn my down.she turn down your fingerling potato as well?
as for your fascinated speculation about a random person's penis size ... go ahead and enjoy yourself.
So then "Pretty Woman" would never happen in real life?
Is Kim Kardashian going to die a lonely old woman because of her past? Or is Kanye able and willing to look past that?
Few means not many, meaning not a lot to boast about. Are you dumb?Not separated by even one sentence.
Apologies. I thought he said "quite a few."
The question is, would he have the casual sex with CF, given the remoteness of that possibility?
this forum has also established you are quite a dolt.
dolt? I won't be sleeping for a week after det one.
any reason you've waited to defend CF's gender til the 10,000th or so time this forum whom you supposedly speak for called her a man?
I don't know what makes folks insist she's a guy.
Except the ones who think she's me.
I've heard mixed reviews from friends about this subject, though..most minorities that I've spoken to seem to have a 10- limit, while the White boys that I've spoken to are seemingly less likely to give a ..
IMO, while the number does matter, quality > quan y, tbh..I have girl friend's that have ed 15-20 guys(at a relatively young age), but these girls genuinely liked(or thought they did) most of them..I don't have a problem with that type of girl, tbh..
I'd be more likely to care if it was a woman that ed a lot of men that didn't need to game her, or she gives it up quickly/easily, tbh..
While I'd generally stick with the 2-3 new men per year limit, I do believe a lot of men are insecure about their sexual performance, thus causing unrealistic demands, such as virgins and robotic women, tbh..
Genuinely liking and ing 15-20 guys in a short span of time is a problem, and probably indicative of how committed she will be to you.
Realistically though, being a "proud ho" will backfire on most girls, unless they are an 8+ out of 10, with something to offer..
By "proud ho", I'm referring to the annoying females that constantly discuss their "freedom" and " ing how many guys they want and don't give a what anybody thinks"..that's cool with me, but you'll probably have a difficult time catching a quality guy to date, unless you find a new group of people/new city
The friends that I have that amassed that list were having sex since they were 15 or so, and they're 21-22 now..
Having sex with 15 or so guys that you like, in 6-7 years, isn't surprising or difficult, in today's society..
To be fair, the girls that I know that have this history have claimed that they regret having sex with this amount of guys, but I wouldn't hold it against them..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
