Reply With Quote
Except the info that shows it isn't.
I really don't care to beat this dead horse at this time. The more info that comes out the more it looks like a political stall/coverup.
Except the info that shows it isn't.
Thanks for your interest in the Fox News organization, but we're going in another direction at this time. Feel free to reapply in the future.
I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that they took out the info because they didn't want the terrorists to know they were tracking them down. Although I doubt CC buys that story.
As I said previously, the terrorist's publicly claimed credit for the hit. They expected them to know. Are you claiming that US were using some kind of reverse psychology on them to make them think US didn't know they claimed responsibility for the hit and instead were going to drop the hammer of the Federal God on some stupid filmmaker in California? (which they did).
Sorry, CC -- your conspiracy failboat has smash on the rocks of reality. You said Petraeus was being blackmailed and was going to expose Obama in his testimony.
You were wrong.
Source: TPM
McCain: ‘Surprised’ By Report That DNI Removed Terrorism References In Rice’s Benghazi Talking Points
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) released a statement on Tuesday in which he responded to reports that the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) scrubbed references to Al-Qaeda from the unclassified talking points used by United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice and others following the September attack in Benghazi.
McCain said the revelation runs counter to what he was told by intelligence officials during Senate hearings and serves as another reminder of why he and other Republicans are "su ious" of the Obama administration's response to the attack.
The statement:
“I am somewhat surprised and frustrated to read reports that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was responsible for removing references to Al-Qaeda from the unclassified talking points about the Benghazi attack that Ambassador Susan Rice and other officials used in the early days after September 11, 2012. I participated in hours of hearings in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week regarding the events in Benghazi, where senior intelligence officials were asked this very question, and all of them – including the Director of National Intelligence himself – told us that they did not know who made the changes. Now we have to read the answers to our questions in the media. There are many other questions that remain unanswered. But this latest episode is another reason why many of us are so frustrated with, and su ious of, the actions of this Administration when it comes to the Benghazi attack.”
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.co...rorism?ref=fpa
Later, when Senator McCain was advised that it was Tuesday, he remarked that he was surprised about that as well.
The Republicans’ new focus of attack in the faux “Benghazi-gate” scandal is Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, claiming that he lied about the source of changes to talking points on the Benghazi attack given to U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.
Yesterday, a DNI spokesperson debunked accusations made by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and other Republicans that the White House changed Rice’s Benghazi talking points, saying that it was the intelligence community that made the “substantive” changes to the talking points. Moreover, former CIA head David Petraeus and other top intelligence officials have said there was no politicization of the process and that the talking points were not altered to minimize the role of extremists but to reflect the best intelligence at the time.
McCain appeared to accept the new information but wondered why Clapper and other DNI officials did not provide this information during closed door hearings last week. And now that all their earlier attacks on Rice have fell apart, Republicans and conservative media figures are directing their attacks at Clapper, a George W. Bush appointee:
– BILL O’REILLY: Now it’s James Clapper, President Obama’s national security guy who is saying, “Oh, it’s me. I sent Rice out there and I took out all the al Qaeda stuff.” I’m not buying it. None of this adds up. … All right so there’s a lot of lying going on here.
It still doesn't matter who removed the reference Dan.
Susan Rice had no intelligence to implicate the YouTube video.
It's your conspiracy theories that don't matter.
Here we go with Bouchump lying again. I always said that could be a theory and never made a flat statement that I believed it to be the case. Just another Chump bull post.
Here you go Bouchump. Please note the qualifier "hypothetical" to put it on the table for discusion. GFY.
That was still before his second testimony. His second testimony did not match his first testimony. How does chumpster explain this?
Someone changed your talking points.
Keep ankle biting, . You are what you are. Glad I'm not you.
Keep the conspiracy alive, truther. You are what you are. Glad I'm not you.
ChumpDumber just doesn't know when to let go of an ankle.
Neither of you don't know when to let go of a failed conspiracy theory.
What conspiracy?
I'm only saying the timing of the hammer falling is no accident.
Yeah, that conspiracy.
WTF...
You call that a conspiracy?
That's normal politics at work!
Nah, it's something you made up to confirm your bias.
remember det one time when F&F was going to cost barry the re-election? crofl
It should have. Problem is, America has turned into a majority of idiots.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
