although the refs were horrible, the Spurs did cover the line of +3. It wasn't gambling related it was a nonsense 6th foul on Tim that turned the tide.
Hey i am just following the logic that he used...o and after checking the score again the Mavs actually won game 3...and no i wont get the off the forums...NO
SHUT THE UP ING IDIOT PUTTING WORDS IN OUR MOUTHS
WE DESERVED TO LOSE GAME 2 WE PLAYED TY
WE WON ING GAME 3, SHUT THE UP STUPID ING GOT GET THE OFF THE FORUMS.
sorry had to vent on idiot
LOL. Bitter Much?
GG Spurs. Too bad the refs didn't fall for your flopping. So sad. Go Mavs, and Go Suns!
he's not saying to stop calling any fouls, just stop calling the touch bull - especially one sided like it was tonight, tuesday, and many other games. Calling fouls according to the basketball rules is really simple - a foul is when a player gains an unfair compe ive advantage through the use of physical contact. Therefore, if the offensive player initiates contact and the defensive player is not initiating contact - there is no foul on the defensive player and only a foul if the offensive player uses the contact to gain an unfair advantage against the defensive player. Otherwise no call. Same on the outside. If a player pushes, kicks, hits, or forcefully moves another player with his body in a way that creates an unfair advantage through contact then the foul is called. And a foul should NEVER be called on a player that does not initiate contact. NEVER. Not that hard to do. That is why it is so obvious that the refs are criminally biased. They call it fair only when they want to be fair. They screw a team that they are told to screw. Plain and Simple.
Are we talking about Manu or Dirk here?
You lost game 3. And you called him an idiot?
My point exactly...
Harris was getting and ones all night on plays that Parker has been going to the basket on and getting knocked ass over teacup all year with nary a toot.
Spurs fans are an embarassment. What a bunch of ing pussies.
Refs played well. Spurs have to go look at the tape and see how they can defend the refs in Game 4.
It's gonna be interesting.
So if the first thing that happens on that play is Dirk steps on Duncans foot, why isn't that a foul on Dirk?
For those of you who have been complaining about the number of free throws we (Mavs) got... is your memory really that short? Here are the stats of the number of free throws from the 2003 playoffs between the Mavs and Spurs:
Game 2: Spurs 45 Mavs 22
Game 3: Spurs 26 Mavs 6
Game 4: Spurs 31 Mavs 13
Where were your cries for "fair officiating" back then?
It's the same principle as when Dirklutz manages to trip himself going out of bounds and it's the fault of the defender.
go ahead and put on game 1
What a bunch of ing cry babies all of you are. . .
Game 1: Mavs 50 Spurs 48
Yep...That should have been Spurs ball....Instead, Dirk heads to foul line once again....
I guess they have to help him keep his average up, since he can't hit from the floor....
So when the SPURS win this series, I guess the Mav fans can't
blame it on the refs.
yes interesting phantom call, and yet the real tripping call wasn't called. Yeah we have no right to complain about these refs performance tonight.
Hey what happened?
Game 1 didn't come up on your post. It might be my computer. Damn!
like i already said GAME 1-MAVS 50 SPURS 48
However mavs made 49 of 50 while the spurs made only 31 of 48
Is Dirk a delicate flower that needs to be protected?
MavFanSinceDayOne? When? April 28, 2006?
2003 Conf. Finals
Game 1 - Mavs 50 Spurs 48
Game 2 - Spurs 45 Mavs 22
Game 3 - Spurs 26 Mavs 6
Game 4 - Spurs 31 Mavs 13
Game 5 - Spurs 38 Mavs 23
Game 6 - Spurs 21 Mavs 11
Apparently so. A delicate white flower in a bastion of whiteness.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
