Reply With Quote
The NBA rulebook.
And what are Spurs rules?
The NBA rulebook.
Oh, yes, just because I am born with Jewish blood I should be genetically forced to believe in a god.
That's one of the most racist things I've ever heard or read.
What do the Spurs have to do with the fact that Amare and Diaw ran off the bench during an altercation? That's the rule. So you are saying that the suspensions were justified, right?
Aparently the official NBA 2006-2007 rules, specifically, that rule that hasn't changed in 10 years to which the Suns should be immune to.
You're the one who brought religion into this thread, fool.
The rule hasn't changed but it has been bent before to preserve fairness.
, we're going around in circles here...
This is quickly becoming the best thread ever...
Ah, you mean bent in hundreds of cir stances for which you have no references or proof to?
No, YOU SPURS FANS are the one who brought religion into this thread. I was referring to the Jewish state, not the religion.
Hey NBAisDead, can you archive this in your memory banks so we can download it later for future reference?
Why don't the Suns give to the Jews anyway?
Hmmmmmmmm.
I blame blacks, jews and Manu for sending Nash to the fishing hole.
No it hasn't. Not in that situation. Not once. Not ever. Not in all the NBA games that have been played since the rule took effect. And the rule HAS been changed, FYI.
Still lacking any semblance of proof:
1. Other instances of players going onto the court during an altercation and not getting suspended.
2. Spurs donating money to Israel.
3. Suns Fan intelligence.
I should have known better than to delude myself with the misconception that I would find intelligent debate here...
I take it back. NBAisDEAD, keep it up!
If you haven't seen an example, then either you have a bad memory, are lying to yourself, or haven't watched many basketball games in the last decade.
That's not why you said you were here.
More lies!
And you have yet to expound on your theory. Let's hear it. And while you're at it, you can tell me why the Amare and Diaw should be allowed to get away without a mandatory suspension for breaking the rule?
Experimenting through debate. Must I explain everything to you?
If citing examples, referencing official rules and precedent, and refuting points which have no proof is not intelligent debate, then I'd like to see the Suns Fan spin on intelligent debate.
Is that were you just take popular opinion and pass it off as fact?
The lack of intelligence is in your 50+ posts.
We're asking you to provide proof to back up your argument. So far you have provided whines, gripes, Israel, donations, and opinions.
You have yet to do so.
You said you were a scientist here to experiment on Spurs fans. So you are lying again? Have you told the truth once? Really, the more you fail to explain how any part of this is actually unfair, the more I enjoy the fact that the Spurs beat the Suns and there really isn't any legitimate gripe to be made about the series.
Read over my previous threads and you will find all your questions have been answered ten fold. You, being a Spurs fan, just refuse to accept the truth.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
