5 consecutive nervous laughter emoticons in a row. Yup, shook.
5 consecutive nervous laughter emoticons in a row. Yup, shook.
es called out.
A futile meme response by one of said es.
Blake gonna need a thread posts count for DJohn2oo8 vs. me. Get on that, cuck.
Either would be acceptable, numb nuts.
The real Dunning-Kruger poster.
You can neither read nor quote anymore. Yup, destroyed.
still upset I gave up on your word salad after you refused to clarify what you were trying to say
your life
Nope. Try reading it again.
Try quoting it again.
You failed at both, Spurtacular.
ArgleBargle.
"team of traitors"
Bookmarking this , pizzaboichik
You will never live this post down. It will be more epic than your pizzagate fail.
Then what?
The only mystery to me at this point:
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
Why would you bookmark something that still holds true to what I said? None of the indictments have anything to do with Trump or the election. Have you not read the indictments or sentencing memorandum?
You've basically admitted your Trump/Russia collusion theory is dead. Meanwhile the OIG is working with Federal Prosecutors investigating all of the corrupt FBI/DOJ officials I've been talking about for months. How's that working out for McCabe?
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
Not really. I have concluded that Trump is not fully compromised by Russia.
That is vastly different from "basically admitting that Trump didn't collude with Russia" merely that they don't appear to be blackmailing him.
The problem, even then, is that expelling diplomats when every other western power does so, isn't as conclusive as I would like.
I'll admit I was wrong, but at this point I'm 100% correct. None of the indictments have anything to do with Trump or the election.
add in arming Ukraine and blowing the up 200+ Russians in Syria with strategic bombers
I would, and will, point out: yet again.
What will that say to you about the way you approach information, that your theories about what is reality fail, repeatedly, to bear out?
Will do maybe do some introspection? I wonder.
What conclusion could you reach about the way you approach reality?
Some dinky sniper rifles: meh. The anti-tank weapons meant more, but one has to wonder why Tillerson was fired so shortly thereafter.
Trump didn't order that strike, and couldn't have know about it before hand, it happened too quickly, stupid mother er, Trump didn't order it.
And yet I'm 100% correct at this point. When it is proven I was 100% correct the whole time and there never was Trump/Russia election collusion what will you do?
What excuse will you make when you turn out to be 100%, absolutely, positively wrong?
What will that say to you about the way you approach information?
What will that say about your theories that fail?
I wonder if you will do some introspection.
So you admit you haven't been proven correct? Got it
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)