So what's the deal?

[hehateme]

You sound like you know about legal matters - don't do the site any favors!


with your help - this would be seen as "retaliation"


Nevermind -

keep advising the site - please!

I know what libel means, and I know how to laugh at your fat mariachi ass and type in caps to emphasize my laughter....LOL

[Blake]

You sound like you know about legal matters - don't do the site any favors!


with your help - this would be seen as "retaliation"


Nevermind -

keep advising the site - please!

You have no clue what you're talking about, idiot.

[silverblk mystix]

You have no clue what you're talking about, idiot.

Please - assist this site in legal matters.

It would be of great benefit.

[ChumpDumper]

How can anyone take you seriously when you are trying to troll every other post?

Just say what you mean in plain English.

Like a man.

[xmas1997]

you're a pathetic human.

No, he is warning you of clear and real rule violations and the repercussions based upon the rules as set forth by the owner Kori.

To elaborate from Kori's post of said rules:

3. Banning - I don't like banning people. I don't get any power trip from the forum. It's just a message board and no one should take it that seriously. I'd rather you learn how to be relatively civil than ban you. I don't mind opposing viewpoints at all, but there are some offenses that could get you banned:

A. Attacks on fellow posters using personal information. It doesn't matter how you got the information. Just don't do it.

B. Posting a picture of a fellow poster. The only exception is if the poster put the picture on SpursTalk themselves.

Does anyone need to be slapped in the face by these words?

She is protecting you and this site.

But someone on here is clearing dropping the ball and putting her and this site in jeopardy, let along any of you.

[ChumpDumper]

No, he is warning you of clear and real rule violations and the repercussions based upon the rules as set forth by the owner Kori.

To elaborate from Kori's post of said rules:

3. Banning - I don't like banning people. I don't get any power trip from the forum. It's just a message board and no one should take it that seriously. I'd rather you learn how to be relatively civil than ban you. I don't mind opposing viewpoints at all, but there are some offenses that could get you banned:

A. Attacks on fellow posters using personal information. It doesn't matter how you got the information. Just don't do it.

B. Posting a picture of a fellow poster. The only exception is if the poster put the picture on SpursTalk themselves.

Does anyone need to be slapped in the face by these words?

She is protecting you and this site.

But someone on here is clearing dropping the ball and putting her and this site in jeopardy, let along any of you.

No, SBM is talking about legal action.

Not forum rules.

[xmas1997]

I don't care what the rules say, I will encourage all to keep violating them.

It is a very clear violation that my personal info is still posted on here without my permission against the rules, in fact it cannot even be posted WITH my permission!

Do you deny that?

And my pic is posted even though I never posted it, which is also a violation.

Do you deny that as well?

[ChumpDumper]

It is a very clear violation that my personal info is still posted on here without my permission against the rules, in fact it cannot even be posted WITH my permission!

Do you deny that?

And my pic is posted even though I never posted it, which is also a violation.

Do you deny that as well?

Are you being serious?

I will discuss this with you if you say you are serious about it.

[Slomo]

No one is telling you how to run things.


We are pointing out that this site is condoning what they want to condone when it is their friends.

And

acting upon those that are not your friends.

Your "buy your own site" will not be an excuse of "ignorance of the law" when issues such as racism,ageism & hostile environment are investigated.

When you allow people to act like fools -
and try to "moderate" other people for doing the same thing - we have what we have here -which is a pattern of discrimination and a pattern of abuses which are condoned and selectively applied causing and creating a hostile environment.

This pattern has been apparent for years and the only true "system" you have is running to do some "moderating"

when your friends run to you. These same friends have nothing vested in this site and could give two s if any illegalities occur.


If you want to run a cesspool - it is your business. If you want to run a cesspool where only your friends can sling and open it to the public - then be prepared for the public to expect to be treated fairly.

Otherwise - be sure you have enough money - for the inevitable litigation.

As far as your labeling me an idiot while under the authority and representation duty of this site - it merely reveals your favoritism and unprofessionalism. Idiot is not a label that such a person acting in such manner should convincingly apply to anyone else.


If you are unable to effectively do your job - then you should allow someone who is qualified and who is able to do it - otherwise you are placing the site and yourself in a position of liability.

So your reply is a set of threats.

OK, duly noted.

I will ask you to stop posting on this forum, because it is obvious there is nothing more to discuss.

[AlexJones]

Slomo any chance you can unban my main Dallas?

[xmas1997]

So your reply is a set of threats.

OK, duly noted.

I will ask you to stop posting on this forum, because it is obvious there is nothing more to discuss.

Those are not threats, they are merely the facts, and a warning of serious trouble that the site could get itself into if not properly moderated according to Kori's rules for this site!

Why are you taking offense due to Kori's rules set down in black and white on this very site?

That is not right either, he violates no rules by stating the truth.

[ChumpDumper]

Those are not threats, they are merely the facts, and a warning of serious trouble that the site could get itself into if not properly moderated according to Kori's rules for this site!

Why are you taking offense due to Kori's rules set down in black and white on this very site?

That is not right either, he violates no rules by stating the truth.

So who would sue the site?

SBM?

You?

[xmas1997]

So your reply is a set of threats.

OK, duly noted.

I will ask you to stop posting on this forum, because it is obvious there is nothing more to discuss.

I say this because the use of the "IF" word is not, nor never will be a statement of fact, rather it is usually a statement of "potential and/or possible" CONSEQUENCE, If things do not change for the better.

Surely you understand that.

[ChumpDumper]

I say this because the use of the "IF" word is not, nor never will be a statement of fact, rather it is usually a statement of "potential and/or possible" CONSEQUENCE, If things do not change for the better.

Surely you understand that.

So under what cir stances will you sue SpursTalk?

Make yourself perfectly clear.

[Chomag]

Man, you guys really need to go outside more.

[Slomo]

I say this because the use of the "IF" word is not, nor never will be a statement of fact, rather it is usually a statement of "potential and/or possible" CONSEQUENCE, If things do not change for the better.

Surely you understand that.

Stay out of it xmas. Semantics are great, but a thinly veiled threat is still exactly that: a threat.

[Clipper Nation]

Why did HI-FI and spurraider21 get banned when the Old got Crew is allowed to spam their garbage 24/7?

[DarrinS]

Wow.

[xmas1997]

Stay out of it xmas. Semantics are great, but a thinly veiled threat is still exactly that: a threat.

I am honor bound to state the truth.

Your accusationj of it being "thinly veiled" is a matter of OPINION, not FACT.

Keep that in mind, and don't allow it to gravitate into something perceived as an attack on your character which it is not.

Be tolerant, please, of some emotions that easily are riled due to unfairness, however perceived rightly or wrongly.

[rogues]

Can thunderup be unbanned? He learned his lesson tbh.

[DisAsTerBot]

lol someone just got told to gtfo!

[ChumpDumper]

I am honor bound to state the truth.

Your accusationj of it being "thinly veiled" is a matter of OPINION, not FACT.

Keep that in mind, and don't allow it to gravitate into something perceived as an attack on your character which it is not.

Be tolerant, please, of some emotions that easily are riled due to unfairness, however perceived rightly or wrongly.

You and SBM have both threatened to sue the site.

Just own it.

[Clipper Nation]

Can thunderup be unbanned? He learned his lesson tbh.

Also, approve Enrique Parker already... he won't threaten to sue the site

[Cry Havoc]

No one is telling you how to run things.


We are pointing out that this site is condoning what they want to condone when it is their friends.

And

acting upon those that are not your friends.

Your "buy your own site" will not be an excuse of "ignorance of the law" when issues such as racism,ageism & hostile environment are investigated.

When you allow people to act like fools -
and try to "moderate" other people for doing the same thing - we have what we have here -which is a pattern of discrimination and a pattern of abuses which are condoned and selectively applied causing and creating a hostile environment.

This pattern has been apparent for years and the only true "system" you have is running to do some "moderating"

when your friends run to you. These same friends have nothing vested in this site and could give two s if any illegalities occur.


If you want to run a cesspool - it is your business. If you want to run a cesspool where only your friends can sling and open it to the public - then be prepared for the public to expect to be treated fairly.

Otherwise - be sure you have enough money - for the inevitable litigation.

As far as your labeling me an idiot while under the authority and representation duty of this site - it merely reveals your favoritism and unprofessionalism. Idiot is not a label that such a person acting in such manner should convincingly apply to anyone else.


If you are unable to effectively do your job - then you should allow someone who is qualified and who is able to do it - otherwise you are placing the site and yourself in a position of liability.

[Cry Havoc]

Remember guys. This is all very not serious to xmas and sbm. That's why they have threatened to beat people in real life (probably grounds for losing your badge if you were a real police) and suing the site.

Because it's not serious.

So not serious.

They're joking.

They're all joking and trolling.

This entire time.

That's why they threaten the site mods.

Not serious.



There aren't enough gifs on the internet to express the hypocrisy properly.