So what does it actually mean, Darrin?
What books should be removed?
"At Fort Campbell, administrators and librarians are interpreting the guidance to apply to anything that deals with diversity, inclusion or equity, and anything that could be perceived to promote one group over another or make one group look bad, the source said. That would include any books that mention slavery, the civil rights movement or the treatment of Native Americans."
Not very smart librarians
So what does it actually mean, Darrin?
What books should be removed?
No I'm saying the reason you voted for Trump. I know you're loud and proud for him.
How do you know your bartender is laughing with you and not at you
So, it's a disorder. "XX" is still a female, with a disorder, is what you and your paper are saying.
I haven't read it but you probably misread it
Disorder is in the ing le, you moron.
Here, read the summary. There may be a good text to voice app out there if you're unable to read.
Disease Information
Summary
46,XX testicular disorder of sex development is a condition in which a person with two X chromosomes (which is normally found in females) has a male appearance. More specifically, people with this condition have male external genitalia, ranging from normal to ambiguous. Other common signs and symptoms include small testes, gynecomastia, infertility due to azoospermia (lack of sperm), and health problems related to low testosterone. Less often, affected people may experience abnormalities such as undescended testes and hypospadias. Gender role and gender iden y are normally reported as male. This condition may occur if the SRY gene (which is usually found on the Y chromosome) is misplaced onto the X chromosome. This generally occurs to do an abnormal exchange of genetic material between chromosomes (a translocation). Less commonly, the condition may be due to copy number variants or rearrangements in or around the SOX9 or SOX3 gene. In some affected people, the underlying cause is unknown. In most cases, the condition occurs sporadically in people with no family history of the condition.
So it's a female with balls? What bathroom does your team want them in?
I quite agree. No librarians should comply.
Trump's top down, brute force censorship of naughty words and "divisive concepts" is facially unconsitutional and relies on no valid legal authority -- it's rule by decree.
Biden used the above tact all the time...in the rapt belief that Trump would never make President again.
tee, hee.
oh piffle,
Biden never distributed lists of verboten naughty words
and went around firing "DEI hires"
and cutting funding
and threatening to cut funding
and letting his campaign crony crawl all over government like a soviet commissar, imagine George Soros doing this and not El0n
Preverbal Darrin.
No, he went around forcing people to use pronouns that were made up and punished those that "misgendered" or refused to play along with the fantasy.
Getting rid of DEI is getting rid of racism in government.
As for your other comment, the librarians represent a sentiment of "malicious compliance." Don't worry, as with Pete Hegseth's handling of the Tuskeegee Airmen idiocy, this too will be rectified.
George Soros was doing it. With my tax dollars.
Also getting rid of programs to hire veterans and accommodate the disabled.
You misspelled farmers and veterans
not comparable to mass partisan purges, nullifying appropriations, censoring and criminalizing core functions of government
the woke right is censoring libraries
campus radicals though
https://bookriot.com/iowa-rushes-adv...lization-bill/HF 274 was introduced by Helena Hayes (IA District 88). The bill would erase protections that public libraries and educational ins utions have related to “obscene” materials. The bill would also restrict where and how minors could access the public library. As the obscenity laws are written now, minors are permitted to attend any event at a public library or public school, as well as access any materials available therein. HF 274 would kick open the door of barring anyone under the age of 18 from utilizing the library or its materials were it believed so-called “obscene” material were available.
airlines sue for the right to continue losing and destroying people's wheelchairs
are public accommodations for disabled people wasteful?
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/busine...-accessibilitySome of the biggest US airlines are seeking to overturn a sweeping Biden administration rule that would impose higher standards for accommodating passengers with disabilities, particularly wheelchair users.
American Airlines Group Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc., JetBlue Airways Corp., Southwest Airlines Co. and United Airlines Holdings Inc. joined the industry group Airlines for America on Tuesday to ask the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals to invalidate the rule. They said in a court filing that the US Department of Transportation had exceeded its authority and abused its discretion.
True, but you opened the door, you struck the mold.
Now? Get the out of the way, OR, stand down AGAIN.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)